Baskin-Bey Edwina S, Stewart Charmaine A, Mitchell Mary M, Bida John P, Rosenthal Theodore J, Nyberg Scott L
Department of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ethn Dis. 2008 Summer;18(3):357-64.
Audiovisual simulations of real-life driving (ie, driving simulators) have been used to assess neurologic dysfunction in a variety of medical applications. However, the use of simulated driving to assess neurologic impairment in the setting of liver disease (ie, hepatic encephalopathy) is limited.
The aim of this analysis was to develop a scoring system based on simulated driving performance to assess mild cognitive impairment in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy.
This preliminary analysis was conducted as part of the Hepatic Encephalopathy Assessment Driving Simulator (HEADS) pilot study. Cirrhotic volunteers initially underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests to identify those cirrhotic patients with mild cognitive impairment. Performance during an audiovisually simulated course of on-road driving was then compared between mildly impaired cirrhotic patients and healthy volunteers. A scoring system was developed to quantify the likelihood of cognitive impairment on the basis of data from the simulated on-road driving.
Mildly impaired cirrhotic patients performed below the level of healthy volunteers on the driving simulator. Univariate logistic regression and correlation models indicated that several driving simulator variables were significant predictors of cognitive impairment. Five variables (run time, total map performance, number of collisions, visual divided attention response, and average lane position) were incorporated into a quantitative model, the HEADS scoring system. The HEADS score (0-9 points) showed a strong correlation with cognitive impairment as measured by area under the receiver-operator curve (.89).
The HEADS system appears to be a promising new tool for the assessment of mild hepatic encephalopathy.
现实驾驶的视听模拟(即驾驶模拟器)已被用于评估各种医学应用中的神经功能障碍。然而,在肝病(即肝性脑病)背景下使用模拟驾驶来评估神经损伤的情况有限。
本分析的目的是基于模拟驾驶表现开发一种评分系统,以评估肝硬化合并肝性脑病患者的轻度认知障碍。
这项初步分析是作为肝性脑病评估驾驶模拟器(HEADS)试点研究的一部分进行的。肝硬化志愿者最初接受了一系列神经心理学测试,以确定那些患有轻度认知障碍的肝硬化患者。然后比较轻度受损的肝硬化患者和健康志愿者在视听模拟道路驾驶过程中的表现。根据模拟道路驾驶的数据开发了一种评分系统,以量化认知障碍的可能性。
在驾驶模拟器上,轻度受损的肝硬化患者的表现低于健康志愿者的水平。单因素逻辑回归和相关模型表明,几个驾驶模拟器变量是认知障碍的重要预测指标。五个变量(运行时间、总地图表现、碰撞次数、视觉分散注意力反应和平均车道位置)被纳入一个定量模型,即HEADS评分系统。HEADS评分(0 - 9分)与通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积测量的认知障碍有很强的相关性(0.89)。
HEADS系统似乎是评估轻度肝性脑病的一种有前景的新工具。