Ayer David W, Jayathilake Karu, Meltzer Herbert Y
Research Department at Centerstone, 1101 6th Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37208, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Oct 30;161(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.07.029. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
The present study examined the ability of the International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) and the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) to predict suicide attempts or hospitalizations to prevent attempts (referred to as Type 1 events) during the InterSePT trial [Meltzer, H.Y., Alphs, L., Green, A.I., Altamura, A.C., Anand, R., Bertoldi, A., Bourgeois, M., Chouinard, G., Islam, M.Z., Kane, J., Krishman, R., Lindenmayer, J.P., Potkin, S., 2003. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia. Archive of General Psychiatry 60, 82-91]. The primary goal of this analysis was to determine if the ISST and CDS ratings indicated that the raters, an unblinded (UP) and a blinded psychiatrist (BP) using the ISST, and a blinded rater using the CDS, were able to identify those patients who had a Type 1 event. The ratings of patients adjudged to have experienced a Type 1 event (Group 1) were compared with patients who did not (Group 2). The ISST and the CDS ratings obtained 2-8 weeks prior to a Type 1 event (Pre-1) and Pre-2, the rating immediately prior to Pre-1, obtained 2-12 weeks before Pre-1, were analyzed to test the hypothesis that the difference between Pre-2 and Pre-1 ratings for the Group 1 patients was significantly greater than the difference in the comparable ratings for Group 2 patients. The prediction that patients with Type 1 events would show greater worsening in ISST and CDS ratings between Pre-2 and Pre-1 than the Group 2 patients was confirmed. However, the sensitivity and specificity of a worsening in ratings was not sufficient to provide definitive warning of an impending Type 1 event. Other characteristics of the patients with Type 1 events provide additional warning: e.g. overall higher ratings on these scales, slower improvement in suicidality during treatment, and previous number of suicide attempts. These results indicate that the ISST and CDS may provide some additional information that can assist clinical decision making regarding suicidal risk in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
本研究检验了国际自杀预防试验(InterSePT)自杀思维量表(ISST)和卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDS)在InterSePT试验期间预测自杀未遂或预防自杀未遂的住院治疗情况(称为1型事件)的能力[梅尔策,H.Y.,阿尔夫斯,L.,格林,A.I.,阿尔塔穆拉,A.C.,阿南德,R.,贝尔托迪,A.,布尔乔亚,M.,乔伊纳德,G.,伊斯兰,M.Z.,凯恩,J.,克里什曼,R.,林登迈耶,J.P.,波特金,S.,2003年。氯氮平治疗精神分裂症的自杀倾向。《普通精神病学档案》60,82 - 91]。该分析的主要目标是确定ISST和CDS评分是否表明评估者,即使用ISST的非盲法(UP)和盲法精神科医生(BP),以及使用CDS的盲法评估者,能够识别出发生1型事件的患者。将判定经历过1型事件的患者(第1组)的评分与未经历过的患者(第2组)进行比较。分析在1型事件前2 - 8周(Pre - 1)和Pre - 2(Pre - 1前2 - 12周获得的紧接Pre - 1之前的评分)获得的ISST和CDS评分,以检验第1组患者Pre - 2和Pre - 1评分之间的差异显著大于第2组患者可比评分差异的假设。1型事件患者在Pre - 2和Pre - 1之间ISST和CDS评分恶化程度大于第2组患者的预测得到了证实。然而,评分恶化的敏感性和特异性不足以对即将发生的1型事件提供明确预警。1型事件患者的其他特征提供了额外预警:例如,这些量表上的总体评分较高、治疗期间自杀倾向改善较慢以及既往自杀未遂次数。这些结果表明,ISST和CDS可能提供一些额外信息,有助于在精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者中做出关于自杀风险的临床决策。