Eichler Hans-Georg, Pignatti Francesco, Flamion Bruno, Leufkens Hubert, Breckenridge Alasdair
European Medicines Agency, Canary Wharf, London, UK.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 Oct;7(10):818-26. doi: 10.1038/nrd2664. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
Drug regulatory agencies are increasingly pressed by the challenge of finding the appropriate balance between the need for rapid access to new drugs and the need to ensure comprehensive data on their benefits and risks. This dilemma is not new, but has been made more prominent by recent high-profile drug withdrawals and conflicting demands, including the need to improve the efficiency of drug development on one hand, and the need to avoid exposing patients to unnecessary risks or possibly ineffective treatments on the other. Here, we summarize the current demands by stakeholders and the scientific and regulatory issues at stake, describe existing and emerging regulatory approaches, and speculate on future directions, such as evolution of the current regulatory model from a one-off marketing authorization to a life-cycle approach.
药品监管机构在应对挑战时面临着越来越大的压力,即在快速获取新药的需求与确保全面了解其益处和风险数据的需求之间找到适当的平衡。这一困境并非新鲜事,但近期备受瞩目的药品撤市事件以及相互冲突的要求使其更加突出,这些要求包括一方面需要提高药物研发效率,另一方面需要避免让患者面临不必要的风险或可能无效的治疗。在此,我们总结了利益相关者当前的要求以及相关的科学和监管问题,描述了现有的和正在出现的监管方法,并推测了未来的方向,例如从一次性上市许可的现行监管模式向全生命周期方法的演变。