Coslett H B
Department of Neurology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140.
Brain Lang. 1991 May;40(4):425-43. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90141-m.
Most information processing accounts of reading incorporate either two or three mechanisms by which oral reading may be accomplished. The existence of a "third" mechanism by which words may be read lexically but without semantic mediation remains controversial. We report data from a patient (W.T.) with an infarction involving Wernicke's area who was unable to write, repeat, or comprehend words of low imageability yet read these and other words reliably; the patient could not, however, read nonwords. As the patient was unable to read on the basis of sublexical print-to-sound correspondences and, at least for words of low image-ability, was unable to read by means of a semantically mediated process, the data from this patient are most readily accommodated by models of reading incorporating three mechanisms.
大多数关于阅读的信息处理理论都包含两种或三种实现朗读的机制。存在一种“第三种”机制,即可以通过词汇方式阅读单词但无需语义中介,这一点仍存在争议。我们报告了一位患者(W.T.)的数据,该患者因涉及韦尼克区的梗死而无法书写、复述或理解低形象性的单词,但却能可靠地阅读这些单词和其他单词;然而,该患者无法阅读非单词。由于该患者无法基于次词汇的印刷到声音对应关系进行阅读,并且至少对于低形象性的单词,无法通过语义中介过程进行阅读,因此该患者的数据最容易被包含三种机制的阅读模型所接受。