Curtis Jeffrey R, Laster Andrew J, Becker David J, Carbone Laura, Gary Lisa C, Kilgore Meredith L, Matthews Robert, Morrisey Michael A, Saag Kenneth G, Tanner S Bobo, Delzell Elizabeth
Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2008 Oct-Dec;11(4):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
Although the Bone Mass Measurement Act outlines the indications for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for US Medicare beneficiaries, the specifics regarding the appropriate ICD-9 codes to use for covered indications have not been specified by Medicare and are sometimes ambiguous. We describe the extent to which DXA reimbursement was denied by gender and age of beneficiary, ICD-9 code submitted, time since previous DXA, whether the scan was performed in the physician's office and local Medicare carrier. Using Medicare administrative claims data from 1999 to 2005, we studied a 5% national sample of beneficiaries age > or =65 yr with part A+B coverage who were not health maintenance organization enrollees. We identified central DXA claims and evaluated the relationship between the factors listed above and reimbursement for central DXA (CPT code 76075). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between DXA reimbursement, ICD-9 diagnosis code, and Medicare carrier. For persons who had no DXA in 1999 or 2000 and who had 1 in 2001 or 2002, the proportion of DXA claims denied was 5.3% for women and 9.1% for men. For repeat DXAs performed within 23 mo, the proportion denied was approximately 19% and did not differ by sex. Reimbursement varied by more than 6-fold according to the ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted. For repeat DXAs performed at <23 mo, the proportion of claims denied ranged from 2% to 43%, depending on Medicare carrier. Denial of Medicare reimbursement for DXA varies significantly by sex, time since previous DXA, ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted, place of service (office vs facility), and local Medicare carrier. Greater guidance and transparency in coding policies are needed to ensure that DXA as a covered service is reimbursed for Medicare beneficiaries with the appropriate indications.
尽管《骨量测量法案》概述了美国医疗保险受益人进行中央双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)检测的适应症,但医疗保险并未明确规定适用于承保适应症的具体ICD - 9编码,且这些编码有时含糊不清。我们描述了根据受益人的性别和年龄、提交的ICD - 9编码、上次DXA检测后的时间、扫描是否在医生办公室进行以及当地医疗保险承保机构,DXA报销被拒绝的程度。利用1999年至2005年的医疗保险行政索赔数据,我们研究了年龄≥65岁、享有A + B部分保险且未参加健康维护组织的受益人的5%全国样本。我们确定了中央DXA索赔,并评估了上述因素与中央DXA(CPT编码76075)报销之间的关系。多变量逻辑回归用于评估DXA报销、ICD - 9诊断编码和医疗保险承保机构之间的独立关系。对于1999年或2000年未进行DXA检测且2001年或2002年进行了1次检测的人群,女性DXA索赔被拒绝的比例为5.3%,男性为9.1%。对于在23个月内进行的重复DXA检测,被拒绝的比例约为19%,且无性别差异。根据提交的ICD - 9诊断编码,报销差异超过6倍。对于在<23个月内进行的重复DXA检测,索赔被拒绝的比例在2%至43%之间,具体取决于医疗保险承保机构。医疗保险对DXA报销的拒绝因性别、上次DXA检测后的时间、提交的ICD - 9诊断编码、服务地点(办公室与机构)以及当地医疗保险承保机构而有显著差异。需要在编码政策方面提供更多指导和透明度,以确保作为承保服务的DXA能够为有适当适应症的医疗保险受益人报销。