Suppr超能文献

提高美国老年人实用临床试验的效率和效果。

Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of pragmatic clinical trials in older adults in the United States.

机构信息

Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs), Center for Outcomes Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), and Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov;33(6):1211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) seek to improve the generalizability and increase the statistical power of traditional explanatory trials. They are a major tenet of comparative effectiveness research. While a powerful study design, PCTs have been limited by high cost, modest efficiency, and limited ability to fill relevant evidence gaps. Based on an American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) supported meeting of national stakeholders, we propose several innovations and future research that could improve the efficiency and effectiveness of such studies focused in the U.S. Innovations discussed include optimizing the use of community based practices through partnership with Practice Based Research Networks (PBRNs), using information technology to simplify PCT subject recruitment, consent and randomization processes, and utilizing linkages to large administrative databases, such as Medicare, as a mechanism to capture outcomes and other important PCT variables with lower subject and research team burden. Testing and adaptation of such innovations to PCT are anticipated to improve the public health value of these increasingly important studies.

摘要

实用临床试验(PCTs)旨在提高传统解释性临床试验的普遍性和增加其统计效力。它们是比较效果研究的主要原则。虽然这是一种强大的研究设计,但 PCT 受到高成本、适度效率和有限填补相关证据空白的能力的限制。基于美国复苏与再投资法案(ARRA)支持的国家利益相关者会议,我们提出了一些创新和未来研究,这些研究可以提高此类专注于美国的研究的效率和效果。讨论的创新包括通过与实践为基础的研究网络(PBRNs)合作优化利用社区实践,利用信息技术简化 PCT 受试者招募、同意和随机化过程,以及利用与大型行政数据库(如 Medicare)的联系作为一种机制,以较低的受试者和研究团队负担来捕获结果和其他重要的 PCT 变量。预计对这些创新的测试和适应将提高这些日益重要的研究的公共卫生价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/068c/3675785/e501fe3a05dd/nihms473296f1.jpg

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
The promise of comparative effectiveness research.比较效果研究的前景。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 26;305(4):400-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.12.

引用本文的文献

2
Development of a conceptual framework for defining trial efficiency.定义试验效率的概念框架的发展。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0304187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304187. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验