J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;13(3):118-25. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1991.13.3.118.
The purpose of this study was to compare isokinetic strength and flexibility measures between hamstring injured and noninjured athletes. Sixteen university athletes with history of hamstring injury were matched by motor dominance, sport, and position to sixteen university athletes without history of hamstring injury. Each subject was tested for concentric and eccentric quadriceps and hamstring peak torque and reciprocal muscle group ratios on a Kinetic Communicator(R) (KIN-COM) dynamometer at 60 degrees /sec and 180 degrees /sec. Each subject's hamstring flexibility was determined by passively extending the knee while the hip was maintained at 90 degrees of flexion. Analysis of variance indicated that the injured extremity was significantly less flexible than the noninjured extremity within the hamstring injured group, and the hamstring injured group was less flexible than the noninjured group. No significant strength differences existed between the hamstring injured and noninjured group on any isokinetic measure evaluated. The importance of assessing hamstring flexibility is emphasized. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;13(3):118-125.
本研究旨在比较有和无腘绳肌损伤运动员的等速力量和柔韧性测试结果。16 名有腘绳肌损伤史的大学生运动员,根据运动优势、运动项目和位置与 16 名无腘绳肌损伤史的大学生运动员相匹配。每位受试者在 KIN-COM 等动测力仪上以 60°/s 和 180°/s 的角速度进行等长和等张股四头肌及腘绳肌峰力矩和拮抗肌比值测试。每位受试者的腘绳肌柔韧性通过被动伸展膝关节同时髋关节保持 90°屈曲来确定。方差分析表明,在腘绳肌损伤组中,损伤侧下肢的柔韧性明显低于非损伤侧下肢,且损伤组的柔韧性明显低于非损伤组。在任何等速测试中,损伤组和非损伤组之间的力量均无显著差异。强调了评估腘绳肌柔韧性的重要性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;13(3):118-125.