Gok Beril, Sciubba Daniel M, McLoughlin Gregory S, McGirt Matthew, Ayhan Selim, Wolinsky Jean-Paul, Bydon Ali, Gokaslan Ziya L, Witham Timothy F
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2008 Aug;63(2):292-8; discussion 298. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000320441.86936.99.
The role of additional or revision surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is challenging. Postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, and recurrent cervical stenosis are conditions that require detailed clinical and radiographic assessment to define the pathology and assess the need for surgical decompression and fusion. The purpose of this study is to assess the neurological outcome, radiological outcome, and complications of patients undergoing additional or revision surgery for CSM.
Between 2002 and 2006, 30 patients with CSM and postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, or recurrent stenosis underwent surgical decompression and stabilization. The specific procedure was selected according to each patient's medical condition, cervical sagittal alignment, and extent of stenosis. All patients underwent an anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior decompression and instrumented fusion. The charts of these patients were reviewed to assess neurological and radiographic outcomes.
Twenty-five patients (83%) improved postoperatively as measured by the Nurick Myelopathy Scale over a mean follow-up period of 19 months (range, 2-64 mo). The overall complication rate was 27%, consisting of transient monoradiculopathy (7%), dysphagia (10%), and infection (7%). The incidence of nonunion during the follow-up period was 3%.
Although patients with CSM and postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, or junctional stenosis who require revision surgery may risk a substantial likelihood of surgical complications (25% in this series), a significant proportion of patients may experience improved neurological outcomes. In our experience, the cervical sagittal alignment and the extent of stenosis are critical factors to consider when selecting the eventual procedure.
对于脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)患者,进行二次手术或翻修手术具有挑战性。术后假关节形成、不稳定、内固定失败以及颈椎管狭窄复发等情况,需要详细的临床和影像学评估来明确病理状况,并评估手术减压和融合的必要性。本研究的目的是评估接受CSM二次手术或翻修手术患者的神经功能结局、影像学结局及并发症。
2002年至2006年间,30例患有CSM且存在术后假关节形成、不稳定、内固定失败或狭窄复发的患者接受了手术减压和稳定治疗。根据每位患者的病情、颈椎矢状位对线情况以及狭窄程度选择具体手术方式。所有患者均接受了前路、后路或前后联合减压及内固定融合手术。对这些患者的病历进行回顾,以评估神经功能和影像学结局。
根据Nurick脊髓病量表评估,25例患者(83%)术后改善,平均随访期为19个月(范围2 - 64个月)。总体并发症发生率为27%,包括短暂性单神经根病(7%)、吞咽困难(10%)和感染(7%)。随访期间不愈合发生率为3%。
尽管需要翻修手术的CSM患者,以及术后存在假关节形成、不稳定、内固定失败或节段性狭窄的患者,手术并发症风险可能较高(本系列中为25%),但仍有相当一部分患者神经功能结局会得到改善。根据我们的经验,选择最终手术方式时,颈椎矢状位对线情况和狭窄程度是关键考虑因素。