Fagundes Nelson J R, Kanitz Ricardo, Bonatto Sandro L
Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 17;3(9):e3157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003157.
The Americas were the last continents to be populated by humans, and their colonization represents a very interesting chapter in our species' evolution in which important issues are still contentious or largely unknown. One difficult topic concerns the details of the early peopling of Beringia, such as for how long it was colonized before people moved into the Americas and the demography of this occupation. A recent work using mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) data presented evidence for a so called "three-stage model" consisting of a very early expansion into Beringia followed by approximately 20,000 years of population stability before the final entry into the Americas. However, these results are in disagreement with other recent studies using similar data and methods. Here, we reanalyze their data to check the robustness of this model and test the ability of Native American mtDNA to discriminate details of the early colonization of Beringia. We apply the Bayesian Skyline Plot approach to recover the past demographic dynamic underpinning these events using different mtDNA data sets. Our results refute the specific details of the "three-stage model", since the early stage of expansion into Beringia followed by a long period of stasis could not be reproduced in any mtDNA data set cleaned from non-Native American haplotypes. Nevertheless, they are consistent with a moderate population bottleneck in Beringia associated with the Last Glacial Maximum followed by a strong population growth around 18,000 years ago as suggested by other recent studies. We suggest that this bottleneck erased the signals of ancient demographic history from recent Native American mtDNA pool, and conclude that the proposed early expansion and occupation of Beringia is an artifact caused by the misincorporation of non-Native American haplotypes.
美洲是最后一批有人类居住的大陆,其殖民化是我们人类物种进化中非常有趣的一章,其中一些重要问题仍存在争议或很大程度上未知。一个难题涉及白令陆桥早期人类定居的细节,比如在人们迁入美洲之前它被殖民了多久以及这种定居的人口统计学情况。最近一项利用线粒体基因组(mtDNA)数据的研究提出了一个所谓的“三阶段模型”,该模型认为先是非常早期向白令陆桥的扩张,接着是在最终进入美洲之前约2万年的人口稳定期。然而,这些结果与其他近期使用类似数据和方法的研究不一致。在这里,我们重新分析他们的数据,以检验该模型的稳健性,并测试美洲原住民mtDNA区分白令陆桥早期殖民化细节的能力。我们应用贝叶斯天际线图方法,使用不同的mtDNA数据集来恢复支撑这些事件的过去人口动态。我们的结果反驳了“三阶段模型”的具体细节,因为在从非美洲原住民单倍型中清理出来的任何mtDNA数据集中,都无法重现先是向白令陆桥扩张然后是长期停滞的早期阶段。尽管如此,它们与其他近期研究表明的在末次盛冰期白令陆桥出现的适度人口瓶颈以及随后约18000年前的强劲人口增长是一致的。我们认为这个瓶颈从近期美洲原住民mtDNA库中抹去了古代人口历史的信号,并得出结论,所提出的白令陆桥早期扩张和定居是由非美洲原住民单倍型的错误纳入造成的人为现象。