Borsos Gabriella, Rudzki-Janson Ingrid, Stockmann Philipp, Schlegel Karl Andreas, Végh András
Department of Orofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Heim Pál Children's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Jul;69(4):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0747-0. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
The objective of this prospective, comparative study was to evaluate the potential of allowing immediate (within 72 hours) loading of palatal implants used for maximum orthodontic anchorage. This is in contrast to the standard protocol calling for a healing period of 12 weeks.
Sixteen patients with a mean age of 14.22+/-1.37 years for whom orthodontic treatment with maximum anchorage was indicated were randomized into two groups. In the SB (immediate loading) group (n=8, mean age 14.15+/-1.2 years), the implants were employed to provide maximum anchorage for a 1.2 x 1.2 mm TPA wire in combination with a molar band within 72 hours of insertion. In the KB (conventional loading) group (n=8, mean age 14.30+/-1.57 years), the implants were not used for maximum anchorage until a 12-week healing period had elapsed. Patients in both groups with implants that were clinically unstable after insertion were excluded from the study. After conclusion of the treatment, the implants were explanted and embedded using the sawing-grinding technique after Donath. Bone-implant contact (KIK) was analyzed using Bioquant Osteo software version 7.10.10.
The objective of the orthodontic treatment, to achieve maximum anchorage of the first molars, was achieved in both groups. In the SB group, the mean bone-implant contact was 55.0%+/-21.6. In the KB group, the mean bone-implant contact was 73.1%+/-19.8. With a p-value of 0.1661, the difference between the bone-implant contact values was not statistically significant.
The results of our clinical study demonstrate that when implants are clinically stable following insertion, it seems that a 12-week healing phase during which the implants are not loaded leads to a non-statistically significant improvement in osseointegration.
本前瞻性对照研究旨在评估用于最大正畸支抗的腭部种植体即刻(72小时内)加载的可能性。这与要求12周愈合期的标准方案形成对比。
16例平均年龄为14.22±1.37岁、需进行最大支抗正畸治疗的患者被随机分为两组。在SB(即刻加载)组(n = 8,平均年龄14.15±1.2岁),种植体在植入后72小时内用于为一根1.2×1.2 mm的TPA钢丝联合磨牙带提供最大支抗。在KB(传统加载)组(n = 8,平均年龄14.30±1.57岁),种植体在12周愈合期结束前不用于最大支抗。两组中植入后临床不稳定的种植体患者被排除在研究之外。治疗结束后,采用多纳特锯磨技术将种植体取出并包埋。使用Bioquant Osteo软件7.10.10版分析骨-种植体接触(KIK)情况。
两组均实现了正畸治疗的目标,即第一磨牙的最大支抗。SB组的平均骨-种植体接触率为55.0%±21.6。KB组的平均骨-种植体接触率为73.1%±19.8。骨-种植体接触值之间的差异无统计学意义,p值为0.1661。
我们的临床研究结果表明,当种植体植入后临床稳定时,不加载种植体的12周愈合期似乎能使骨结合有非统计学意义的改善。