Schraa-Tam Caroline K L, van Broekhoven Phillippus, van der Geest Josef N, Frens Maarten A, Smits Marion, van der Lugt Aad
Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(2):175-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1569-4. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
Reflexive saccades are driven by visual stimulation whereas voluntary saccades require volitional control. Behavioral and lesional studies suggest that there are two separate mechanisms involved in the generation of these two types of saccades. This study investigated differences in cerebral and cerebellar activation between reflexive and self-paced voluntary saccadic eye movements using functional magnetic resonance imaging. In two experiments (whole brain and cerebellum) using the same paradigm, differences in brain activations induced by reflexive and self-paced voluntary saccades were assessed. Direct comparison of the activation patterns showed that the frontal eye fields, parietal eye field, the motion-sensitive area (MT/V5), the precuneus (V6), and the angular and the cingulate gyri were more activated in reflexive saccades than in voluntary saccades. No significant difference in activation was found in the cerebellum. Our results suggest that the alleged separate mechanisms for saccadic control of reflexive and self-paced voluntary are mainly observed in cerebral rather than cerebellar areas.
反射性扫视由视觉刺激驱动,而自主性扫视则需要意志控制。行为学和损伤研究表明,这两种类型的扫视产生涉及两种不同的机制。本研究使用功能磁共振成像,调查了反射性和自定步速的自主性扫视眼动之间大脑和小脑激活的差异。在两个使用相同范式的实验(全脑和小脑)中,评估了反射性和自定步速的自主性扫视引起的大脑激活差异。对激活模式的直接比较表明,与自主性扫视相比,反射性扫视中额叶眼区、顶叶眼区、运动敏感区(MT/V5)、楔前叶(V6)以及角回和扣带回的激活更强。小脑激活未发现显著差异。我们的结果表明,反射性和自定步速的自主性扫视控制中所谓的不同机制主要在大脑而非小脑区域观察到。