Suppr超能文献

选择性Impella辅助高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性和长期安全性:一项双中心试点研究。

Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study.

作者信息

Burzotta Francesco, Paloscia Leonardo, Trani Carlo, Mascellanti Marco, Mongiardo Rocco, Materazzo Guido, Niccoli Giampaolo, Di Marco Massimo, Leone Antonio Maria, Porto Italo, Mazzari Mario Attilio, Rebuzzi Antonio Giuseppe, Schiavoni Giovanni, Crea Filippo

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Oct;9(10):1004-10. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3282f9abe7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the acute and long-term results of the use of a new intracardiac microaxial pump, the Impella Recover LP 2.5, during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in a two-centre registry.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with poor left ventricular function and multivessel or left main coronary artery disease were considered at high risk of haemodynamic compromise and underwent percutaneous coronary interventions with preintervention Impella implantation. Procedural complications, 30-day and 12-month clinical outcome were recorded. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by echocardiography before procedure and after at least 6 months.

RESULTS

The Impella was implanted before percutaneous coronary interventions by femoral approach and percutaneous coronary interventions were successfully performed (by contra lateral femoral or radial approach) in all cases. After percutaneous coronary intervention, Impella was removed in all patients, and haemostasis was obtained by prolonged manual compression or by double suture device preimplantation technique. No access-site complication was observed and no patient required transfusions. One patient died after Impella removal due to acute stent thrombosis. The other patients had an uncomplicated in-hospital course and were discharged within 5 days. At 1-year follow-up, no patient died nor suffered acute myocardial infarction, whereas two patients underwent re-percutaneous coronary intervention. Left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up increased significantly in this study population (from 31 +/- 7% to 41% +/- 13%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the feasibility and safety of Impella-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients. Prospective randomized trials are needed to test the clinical impact of such an innovative approach.

摘要

目的

我们在一个两中心注册研究中评估了新型心内微轴泵Impella Recover LP 2.5在择期高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的急性和长期结果。

方法

连续10例左心室功能不佳且患有多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者被认为存在血流动力学受损的高风险,在进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前植入Impella进行干预。记录手术并发症、30天和12个月的临床结局。在手术前及至少6个月后通过超声心动图评估左心室射血分数。

结果

Impella通过股动脉途径在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前植入,所有病例均成功进行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(通过对侧股动脉或桡动脉途径)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,所有患者的Impella均被移除,通过延长手动压迫或双缝合法预植入技术实现止血。未观察到穿刺部位并发症,也没有患者需要输血。1例患者在移除Impella后因急性支架血栓形成死亡。其他患者住院过程顺利,5天内出院。在1年随访时,没有患者死亡或发生急性心肌梗死,而有2例患者接受了再次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。在本研究人群中,随访时左心室射血分数显著增加(从31±7%增至41%±13%,P = 0.02)。

结论

我们的结果支持Impella辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在高风险患者中的可行性和安全性。需要进行前瞻性随机试验来测试这种创新方法的临床影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验