• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯沙坦与阿替洛尔、非洛地平及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比的安全性和耐受性。

Safety and tolerability of losartan compared with atenolol, felodipine and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

作者信息

Goldberg A I, Dunlay M C, Sweet C S

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486, USA.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Jul;13(1):S77-80. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199507001-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-199507001-00012
PMID:18800461
Abstract

AIM

To examine the safety profile and tolerability of losartan potassium (losartan), a selective antagonist of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Approximately 2000 hypertensive patients were treated in double-blind clinical trials with losartan, placebo or other antihypertensive drug classes.

RESULTS

Headache (14.1%), upper respiratory infection (6.5%), dizziness (4.1%), asthenia/fatigue (3.8%) and coughing (3.1%) were the most commonly reported clinical adverse experiences in patients treated with losartan. These adverse experiences were also commonly reported in patients treated with a placebo: 17.2, 5.6, 2.4, 3.9 and 2.6%, respectively. A dry cough was reported by 8.8% of patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, statistically greater than that reported in patients treated with losartan and placebo, 3.1 and 2.6%, respectively (P < 0.001, losartan versus ACE inhibitors). Only dizziness was more often considered drug-related in losartan-treated patients (2.4%) than in patients who received placebo (1.3%). In controlled clinical trials, losartan was better tolerated than other antihypertensive agents as determined by the incidence of patients reporting any drug-related adverse experiences. The rate of withdrawal due to clinical adverse experiences in patients treated with losartan was 2.3% compared to 3.7% in patients treated with a placebo. No adverse laboratory results were unexpected or of clinical importance. First-dose hypotension occurred rarely with losartan, and withdrawal effects such as rebound hypertension were not observed in clinical trials. There were no clinically important differences in the clinical or laboratory safety profiles for the demographic subgroups of age, sex or race.

CONCLUSION

In controlled clinical trials losartan has demonstrated an excellent tolerability profile.

摘要

目的

研究血管紧张素II 1型(AT1)受体选择性拮抗剂氯沙坦钾(氯沙坦)的安全性和耐受性。

患者与方法

约2000名高血压患者在双盲临床试验中接受氯沙坦、安慰剂或其他抗高血压药物治疗。

结果

头痛(14.1%)、上呼吸道感染(6.5%)、头晕(4.1%)、乏力/疲劳(3.8%)和咳嗽(3.1%)是接受氯沙坦治疗患者中最常报告的临床不良事件。这些不良事件在接受安慰剂治疗的患者中也很常见,分别为17.2%、5.6%、2.4%、3.9%和2.6%。8.8%接受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂治疗的患者报告干咳,在统计学上高于接受氯沙坦和安慰剂治疗的患者,分别为3.1%和2.6%(P<0.001,氯沙坦与ACE抑制剂相比)。在接受氯沙坦治疗的患者中,只有头晕被认为与药物相关的频率(2.4%)高于接受安慰剂的患者(1.3%)。在对照临床试验中,根据报告任何与药物相关不良事件的患者发生率,氯沙坦的耐受性优于其他抗高血压药物。接受氯沙坦治疗的患者因临床不良事件而停药的比例为2.3%,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者为3.7%。没有出现意外的不良实验室结果或具有临床重要性的结果。氯沙坦很少发生首剂低血压,并且在临床试验中未观察到诸如反跳性高血压等撤药效应。在年龄、性别或种族的人口统计学亚组的临床或实验室安全性方面没有临床重要差异。

结论

在对照临床试验中,氯沙坦已证明具有出色的耐受性。

相似文献

1
Safety and tolerability of losartan compared with atenolol, felodipine and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.氯沙坦与阿替洛尔、非洛地平及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比的安全性和耐受性。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Jul;13(1):S77-80. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199507001-00012.
2
Safety and tolerability of losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, compared with hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, felodipine ER, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for the treatment of systemic hypertension.氯沙坦钾(一种血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂)与氢氯噻嗪、阿替洛尔、缓释非洛地平和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比,用于治疗系统性高血压的安全性和耐受性。
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Apr 15;75(12):793-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80413-5.
3
Placebo effect and efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension not controlled with lisinopril or losartan: a phase IV, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.安慰剂效应及比索洛尔在未被依那普利或氯沙坦控制的高血压患者中的疗效:一项 IV 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Apr;13(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0010-y.
4
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and heart failure: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors remain the first-line option.血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂与心力衰竭:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂仍是一线选择。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Oct;14(79):180-6.
5
Efficacy and safety of losartan.氯沙坦的疗效与安全性。
Can J Cardiol. 1995 Aug;11 Suppl F:27F-32F.
6
Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan.氯沙坦的临床安全性与耐受性。
Clin Ther. 1997 Jul-Aug;19(4):604-16; discussion 603. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80086-0.
7
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of once daily losartan potassium compared with captopril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.与卡托普利相比,每日一次服用氯沙坦钾对轻至中度原发性高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Jul;13(1):S35-41. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199507001-00005.
8
Use of losartan in the treatment of hypertensive patients with a history of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Clin Ther. 1998 Sep-Oct;20(5):978-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80079-9.
9
Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with a previous angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-associated cough.氯沙坦、赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪在曾有血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相关性咳嗽的高血压患者中的双盲比较
J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Jul;13(1):S73-6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199507001-00011.
10
Randomised, double-blind, parallel study of the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan potassium compared with felodipine ER in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.氯沙坦钾与非洛地平缓释片治疗老年轻、中度高血压的疗效及安全性对比的随机双盲平行研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Sep;9(9):765-71.

引用本文的文献

1
[The renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular diseases].[心血管疾病中的肾素-血管紧张素系统]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jul 15;93(7):416-25. doi: 10.1007/BF03042638.