Wienke Totura Christine M, Green Amy E, Karver Marc S, Gesten Ellis L
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, PCD 4118G, Tampa, Florida, 33620, USA.
J Adolesc. 2009 Apr;32(2):193-211. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
The present study assessed agreement between student self-report and teacher ratings of bullying and victimization relative to psychological, behavioral, and academic correlates. Middle school students (N=1442) and teachers completed surveys evaluating peer relationships and psychosocial adjustment. Analyses of variance and logistic regressions were used to examine rater agreement on bullying/victimization and adjustment among groups (bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved) identified by rater (student self-report only, teacher-report only, concordant reports, and controversial reports). Concordant and controversial groups had among the greatest psychosocial and academic difficulties. Student learning difficulties and moodiness interacted with teacher reports of bullying and victimization, respectively, with agreement between teacher and student self reports of bullying greater at higher levels of learning problems and agreement for victimization lower at higher levels of moodiness. The results indicate biases in rater perspective of student behavior and continue to support the need for multiple raters of student functioning.
本研究评估了学生自我报告与教师对欺凌和受欺负情况的评分之间的一致性,以及与心理、行为和学业相关因素的关系。中学生(N = 1442)和教师完成了评估同伴关系和心理社会适应情况的调查。方差分析和逻辑回归用于检验评分者对由评分者(仅学生自我报告、仅教师报告、一致报告和有争议报告)确定的欺凌/受欺负及群体(欺凌者、受害者、欺凌/受害者和未卷入者)适应情况的一致性。一致和有争议的群体存在最大的心理社会和学业困难。学生学习困难和情绪波动分别与教师报告的欺凌和受欺负情况相互作用,在学习问题程度较高时,教师与学生自我报告的欺凌情况的一致性更高,而在情绪波动程度较高时,受欺负情况的一致性更低。结果表明评分者对学生行为的看法存在偏差,并继续支持需要多个评分者来评估学生的功能。