Härtel J, Kriens O, Kundt G
Hospital and Outpatient Dept. of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Rostock, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1991 May;19(4):144-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80301-4.
The different cleft forms of 1,450 cleft lip, alveolus and/or palate patients have been analyzed. Randomized groups of 50 plus the next 50 patients and so forth have been examined. The resulting 29 groups reveal a maximum of 139 different clinical cleft forms. The prediction of a possible maximum was made with the exponential formula y = a. (1-eb.x). The tendency of the prognosis levels at a maximum of 169 different cleft forms in and above 4900 patients.
对1450例唇裂、牙槽突裂和/或腭裂患者的不同裂隙形式进行了分析。对50例患者加上接下来的50例患者等组成的随机分组进行了检查。最终的29组显示出最多139种不同的临床裂隙形式。使用指数公式y = a. (1 - eb.x)对可能的最大值进行了预测。在4900例及以上患者中，预后水平的趋势显示最多有169种不同的裂隙形式。
