Suppr超能文献

验证 Johnson 抗剪附件作为一种准确有效的临床等速仪器的有效性。

Validation of the Johnson Anti-Shear Accessory as an Accurate and Effective Clinical lsokinetic Instrument.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1986;7(6):298-303. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1986.7.6.298.

Abstract

This article reports two separate investigations into the validity of the Johnson Anti- Shear Accessory (JASA) as an isokinetic evaluation and exercise instrument. Experiment I attempted to verify the shear prevention aspect of the device on 10 anterior cruciate ligament injury patients and experiment I1 sought to establish the testing accuracy of the tool in comparison to the standard Cybex(R) knee input shaft (CKIS) on a qualified sample of eight subjects. A Cybex II-CDRC system protocol of five test knee extension/flexion repetitions at velocity spectrum speeds of 60, 120, 180,240, and 300 degrees /sec, preceded by a warm-up of three gradient submaximal and one maximal repetitions, was used for both studies. The null hypothesis was rejected in experiment 1 as an ANOVA test revealed significant factoral differences and Pearson correlation tests showed noncomparison between the JASA (r = 0.79 quadriceps, r = 0.89 hamstrings) and the CKIS (r = 0.23 quadriceps, r = 0.91 hamstrings) relative to the design control. The null hypothesis was accepted in experiment I1 as ANOVA testing failed to show a significant factoral difference while the JASA and CKIS demonstrated strong correlations (r = 0.97 quadriceps, r = 0.99 hamstrings). It was concluded that the JASA effectively controls anterior tibial shear during isokinetic activity and that the JASA is an accurate and valid isokinetic evaluation and exercise device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986;7(6):298-303.

摘要

本文报道了两项分别对 Johnson 抗剪切附件(JASA)作为等速评估和运动仪器的有效性的调查。实验 I 试图在 10 名前交叉韧带损伤患者中验证该设备的防止剪切方面,而实验 II 则试图在 8 名合格受试者中比较该工具与标准 Cybex(R)膝关节输入轴(CKIS)的测试准确性。在两种研究中,都使用 Cybex II-CDRC 系统协议,包括 5 次测试膝关节伸展/屈曲重复,速度谱速度分别为 60、120、180、240 和 300 度/秒,之前进行三次梯度次最大重复和一次最大重复的热身。在实验 1 中,无效假设被拒绝,因为方差分析测试显示出显著的因子差异,而 Pearson 相关测试显示 JASA(r = 0.79 股四头肌,r = 0.89 腘绳肌)和 CKIS(r = 0.23 股四头肌,r = 0.91 腘绳肌)之间无法进行比较。在实验 II 中,无效假设被接受,因为方差分析测试未能显示出显著的因子差异,而 JASA 和 CKIS 表现出很强的相关性(r = 0.97 股四头肌,r = 0.99 腘绳肌)。结论是,JASA 可在等速活动中有效地控制胫骨前剪切,并且 JASA 是一种准确且有效的等速评估和运动仪器。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986;7(6):298-303.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验