Farley Joel F, Cline Richard R, Schommer Jon C, Hadsall Ronald S, Nyman John A
Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1524-39; discussion 1506-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.009.
Antipsychotic medications account for more prescription expenditures in Medicaid than any other therapeutic category. This has made them an attractive target for states hoping to curtail rising expenditures.
The objective of this study was to document the effects of a step-therapy prior authorization (PA) policy for atypical antipsychotic medications on: (1) Medicaid prescription expenditures among all Medicaid beneficiaries and (2) prescription and health service expenditures among patients with schizophrenia.
Prescription, inpatient, outpatient, and long-term care State Medicaid Research Files from Georgia and Mississippi from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1997, were used to model an interrupted time-series analysis. We compared a step-therapy PA policy implemented in Georgia to a nonequivalent/no-treatment control group (Mississippi) over 10-month prepolicy, 11-month policy, and 3-month postpolicy periods. Segmented regression was used to estimate antipsychotic prescription expenditures among all eligible Medicaid beneficiaries. We used generalized estimating equations to model prescription and other health service expenditures with difference-indifference regressions among a cohort of patients with schizophrenia.
Compared with Mississippi, Georgia saved approximately USD 7 million in atypical antipsychotic expenditures over the 11-month policy period. Among patients with schizophrenia, the PA policy was associated with a USD 19.62 per member per month (PMPM) decrease in atypical antipsychotic expenditures and a USD 2.20 PMPM increase in typical antipsychotic expenditures (both, P < 0.001). Among the same patients with schizophrenia however, the reduction in atypical antipsychotic expenditures was accompanied by a USD 31.59 PMPM increase in expenditures for outpatient services (P < 0.001).
Although PA of atypical antipsychotics was associated with significant prescription savings to the Georgia Medicaid program, among a vulnerable cohort of patients with schizophrenia, an increase in outpatient expenditures was associated with overall savings.
在医疗补助计划(Medicaid)中,抗精神病药物的处方支出比任何其他治疗类别都要高。这使得它们成为希望削减不断上涨的支出的各州的一个有吸引力的目标。
本研究的目的是记录非典型抗精神病药物逐步治疗预先授权(PA)政策对以下方面的影响:(1)所有医疗补助计划受益人的医疗补助处方支出,以及(2)精神分裂症患者的处方和医疗服务支出。
使用1996年1月1日至1997年12月31日期间佐治亚州和密西西比州的处方、住院、门诊和长期护理州医疗补助研究档案,进行中断时间序列分析建模。我们将佐治亚州实施的逐步治疗PA政策与非等效/无治疗对照组(密西西比州)在政策前10个月、政策期11个月和政策后3个月进行了比较。分段回归用于估计所有符合条件的医疗补助计划受益人的抗精神病药物处方支出。我们使用广义估计方程,通过对一组精神分裂症患者进行差异-差异回归,对处方和其他医疗服务支出进行建模。
与密西西比州相比,佐治亚州在11个月的政策期内,非典型抗精神病药物支出节省了约700万美元。在精神分裂症患者中,PA政策使非典型抗精神病药物支出每月每位成员减少19.62美元(PMPM),典型抗精神病药物支出每月每位成员增加2.20美元(两者P<0.001)。然而,在同一组精神分裂症患者中,非典型抗精神病药物支出的减少伴随着门诊服务支出每月每位成员增加31.59美元(P<0.001)。
虽然非典型抗精神病药物的PA政策为佐治亚州医疗补助计划带来了显著的处方节省,但在一组脆弱的精神分裂症患者中,门诊支出的增加与总体节省相关。