Blaylock Barbara, Van Nuys Karen, Joyce Geoffrey
Blaylock Health Economics LLC, Reno, Nevada.
Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525155. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25155.
Narrow formularies can be used to increase rebates and manage the use of costly drug therapies in the US.
To examine the association between the breadth of formulary coverage for multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and MS relapse.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 100% Medicare administrative data from 2018 to 2022. The data analysis was conducted from August 1, 2024, to January 30, 2025. Beneficiaries with stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans (MA-PDs) were followed for at least 5 quarters (baseline, quarters 1-4; follow-up, quarter 5). Calendar periods reflected formulary decision-making. Beneficiaries in the same Medicare Part D plan during baseline and follow-up, with relapsing-remitting MS, and with MS DMT use during baseline were included.
Formulary breadth was low coverage if the 4-quarter moving average of MS DMT drug or class coverage was below the median by plan type and quarter; it was considered high coverage if the average was above the median.
The primary outcome was MS relapse, including inpatient or outpatient treatment for MS. Multivariable logistic regressions were estimated separately for PDPs and MA-PDs, controlling for patient and plan characteristics and clustering for repeated observations by beneficiary.
The claims analysis included 50 162 unique beneficiaries in PDPs (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [12.1] years; 74.9% female) and 34 708 in MA-PDs (mean [SD] age, 58.2 [10.3] years; 77.2% female). Oral or injectable MS DMTs were frequently excluded from coverage (>50% excluded in 2022: PDPs, 11 of 15 DMTs; MA-PD, 9 of 15 DMTs). The MS relapse rate was greater for low- vs high-coverage PDPs (10.6% vs 9.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]) and MA-PDs (7.8% vs 6.9; OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]). In multivariable analyses, broader formulary coverage during baseline was associated with less MS relapse during follow-up (PDP: adjusted OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96] for drugs and 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.97] for classes; MA-PD: adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94] for drugs and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98] for classes).
In this cohort study of Medicare data, broader formulary coverage was associated with an 8% to 12% lower odds of MS relapse in MA-PDs and a 6% to 9% lower odds in PDPs. Formulary coverage and restrictions should be tailored for patient need, not just management of costs and use.
在美国,狭义药品目录可用于增加回扣并管理昂贵药物疗法的使用。
研究多发性硬化症(MS)疾病修正疗法(DMT)的药品目录覆盖范围广度与MS复发之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2018年至2022年100%的医疗保险管理数据。数据分析于2024年8月1日至2025年1月30日进行。对拥有独立处方药计划(PDP)和医疗保险优势处方药计划(MA-PD)的受益人进行了至少5个季度的随访(基线,第1 - 4季度;随访,第5季度)。日历期反映了药品目录决策情况。纳入了在基线期和随访期处于同一医疗保险D部分计划、患有复发缓解型MS且在基线期使用MS DMT的受益人。
如果MS DMT药物或药物类别覆盖范围的4季度移动平均值按计划类型和季度低于中位数,则药品目录广度为低覆盖;如果平均值高于中位数,则认为是高覆盖。
主要结局是MS复发,包括MS的住院或门诊治疗。分别对PDP和MA-PD进行多变量逻辑回归分析,控制患者和计划特征,并对受益人的重复观察进行聚类分析。
索赔分析包括PDP中的50162名独特受益人(平均[标准差]年龄,58.5[12.1]岁;74.9%为女性)和MA-PD中的34708名受益人(平均[标准差]年龄,58.2[10.3]岁;77.2%为女性)。口服或注射用MS DMT经常被排除在覆盖范围之外(2022年超过50%被排除:PDP中,15种DMT中有11种;MA-PD中,15种DMT中有9种)。低覆盖PDP与高覆盖PDP相比,MS复发率更高(10.6%对9.5%;优势比[OR],0.88[95%置信区间,0.84 - 0.92]),MA-PD也是如此(7.8%对6.9%;OR,0.88[95%置信区间,0.85 - 0.91])。在多变量分析中,基线期更广泛的药品目录覆盖范围与随访期较少的MS复发相关(PDP:药物调整后OR,0.93[95%置信区间,0.90 - 0.96],药物类别调整后OR,0.94[95%置信区间,0.91 - 0.97];MA-PD:药物调整后OR,0.88[95%置信区间,0.83 - 0.94],药物类别调整后OR,0.92[95%置信区间,0.86 - 0.98])。
在这项关于医疗保险数据的队列研究中