School of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
to describe Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, involvement in legal proceedings and the impact on midwives' clinical practice and personal wellbeing.
the external review process (commonly referred to as the 'Douglas Inquiry') was initiated by a state government and was in response to hospital staff and consumer complaints that focused on anomalies in client care and a significantly high rate of adverse outcomes and clinical errors. It took place within the context of a number of legal proceedings against medical practitioners. As a result, some midwives employed by the hospital were called to give evidence at a variety of legal forums.
a qualitative study using an explorative descriptive design. Snowball sampling was used to invite 16 Australian midwives to participate in a tape-recorded interview. Thematic analysis and the techniques associated with constant comparison were used to analyse the data.
Australian maternity tertiary referral centre.
the analysis identified two overarching themes, 'A story of scrutiny' and 'A story of fear', each with a number of subthemes. 'A story of scrutiny' consists of three subthemes. 'A cloak and dagger affair' reflects the midwives' sense of being and feeling 'exposed' and 'vulnerable' whilst simultaneously being 'kept in the dark' and uninformed during the review process. The subtheme 'Being thrown to the wolves' describes the midwives' experiences of being involved, as witnesses, in medico-legal proceedings. The third subtheme, 'The Inquiry followed them home' outlines the effect on midwives' emotional wellbeing and personal relationships. The second major theme, 'A story of fear' again consists of a number of subthemes. 'Feeling unsafe at work: a culture of fear' describes the midwives' experiences of working within an environment they perceive as driven by the fear of litigation. In order to protect themselves and maintain a sense of control, the midwives adopted a number of strategies to 'feel safe' including defensive decision making and moving towards a medical philosophy of care. These concepts are captured within the subtheme 'Covering your back: setting boundaries'. The impact on relationships between midwives, women and medical practitioners is described within the subtheme 'Professional relationship: coloured by fear'. The effect on midwives' confidence and the resultant negative emotions elicited make up the subtheme 'Between a rock and a hard place: the midwives' distressing dilemma'. Finally the subtheme, 'Opting out: the changing nature of professional work practices' describes the specific professional decisions and work strategies that midwives made about their ability to continue working in an environment that they perceived as threatening.
the findings suggest that the midwife participants in this small study were totally unprepared and ill equipped, both personally and professionally, to deal with the consequences of working within an environment that was the centre of a number of high profile legal proceedings and an extensive external review of obstetric services. The midwives were naïve about legal processes and unprepared for the legal 'game playing' and media attention that often accompanies court proceedings. Despite the fact that no midwife faced litigation, the participants described their work environment as becoming increasingly stressful and permeated by a culture of fear. In turn, this situation has reinforced the need for some midwives to adopt an 'institution' ideology which reinforces birth as an abnormal event that needs to be medically managed. This has led to changes in professional and personal work practices. The findings also have implications for the midwifery workforce and retention. Although the findings are context specific, this study provides valuable insight into the phenomena of fear of litigation and its impact on midwifery practice. Given the similarities concerning obstetric litigation in some other Western nations, the findings have relevance in the international midwifery arena.
描述澳大利亚助产士对产科服务外部审查、参与法律程序以及对助产士临床实践和个人健康的影响的体验。
外部审查程序(通常称为“道格拉斯调查”)是由州政府发起的,是对医院工作人员和消费者投诉的回应,这些投诉集中在客户护理中的异常情况以及明显高的不良结果和临床错误率上。它发生在对医疗从业者的一些法律程序的背景下。因此,一些在医院工作的助产士被要求在各种法律论坛上提供证据。
使用探索性描述性设计的定性研究。使用滚雪球抽样邀请 16 名澳大利亚助产士参加录音采访。使用主题分析和与常数比较相关的技术对数据进行分析。
澳大利亚产科三级转诊中心。
分析确定了两个总体主题,“审查的故事”和“恐惧的故事”,每个主题都有一些子主题。“审查的故事”包括三个子主题。“一场秘密行动”反映了助产士感到“暴露”和“脆弱”,同时在审查过程中感到“被蒙在鼓里”和不知情的感觉。副标题“被扔给狼群”描述了助产士作为证人参与医疗法律程序的经历。第三个子主题“调查跟他们回家”概述了对助产士情绪健康和人际关系的影响。第二个主要主题,“恐惧的故事”,再次由许多子主题组成。“工作中感到不安全:恐惧文化”描述了助产士在他们认为受到诉讼恐惧驱动的环境中工作的经历。为了保护自己并保持控制感,助产士采取了一些策略来“感到安全”,包括防御性决策和转向医疗护理理念。这些概念包含在副标题“保护自己:设置界限”中。副标题“专业关系:恐惧色彩”描述了助产士之间、妇女和医疗从业者之间关系的影响。副标题“在两难境地之间:助产士的痛苦困境”描述了对助产士信心的影响以及由此产生的负面情绪。最后,副标题“退出:专业工作实践性质的变化”描述了助产士在继续在他们认为具有威胁性的环境中工作的能力方面所做出的具体专业决策和工作策略。
研究结果表明,参与这项小型研究的助产士在个人和专业方面都完全没有准备,也没有能力应对在一系列备受瞩目的法律程序和广泛的产科服务外部审查的中心工作的后果。助产士对法律程序一无所知,也没有为法律“游戏”和法庭程序经常伴随的媒体关注做好准备。尽管没有助产士面临诉讼,但参与者描述了他们的工作环境变得越来越紧张,并充斥着恐惧文化。反过来,这种情况加剧了一些助产士采用“机构”意识形态的必要性,这种意识形态强化了分娩是一种需要医学管理的异常事件。这导致了专业和个人工作实践的变化。研究结果还对助产士劳动力和保留产生影响。尽管研究结果具有特定的背景,但这项研究为了解诉讼恐惧及其对助产实践的影响提供了有价值的见解。鉴于一些其他西方国家在产科诉讼方面的相似性,研究结果在国际助产领域具有相关性。