Cain Kate, Towse Andrea S, Knight Rachael S
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Mar;102(3):280-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
Two experiments compared 7- and 8-year-olds' and 9- and 10-year-olds' ability to use semantic analysis and inference from context to understand idioms. We used a multiple-choice task and manipulated whether the idioms were transparent or opaque, familiar or novel, and presented with or without a supportive story context. Performance was compared with that of adults (Experiment 1) and 11- and 12-year-olds (Experiment 2). The results broadly support Cacciari and Levorato's global elaboration model of figurative competence with a notable exception: Even the youngest children were able to use semantic analysis to derive the meanings of transparent idioms as well as being sensitive to meaning in context. The findings show that young children process language at both the small-grain phrase level and the discourse level to establish figurative meaning, and they demonstrate that the language processing skills that aid idiom comprehension, as well as idiom knowledge itself, are still not fully developed in 11- and 12-year-olds.
两项实验比较了7至8岁儿童以及9至10岁儿童运用语义分析和上下文推理来理解习语的能力。我们采用了多项选择题任务,并对习语是否透明、是否熟悉、是否配有支持性故事背景进行了操控。将儿童的表现与成年人(实验1)以及11至12岁儿童(实验2)的表现进行了比较。结果大致支持了卡恰里和莱沃拉托关于比喻能力的全局细化模型,但有一个显著例外:即使是最小的儿童也能够运用语义分析来推导透明习语的含义,并且对上下文的意义敏感。研究结果表明,幼儿在小粒度短语层面和语篇层面处理语言以确立比喻意义,同时也表明,有助于习语理解的语言处理技能以及习语知识本身在11至12岁儿童中仍未完全发展成熟。