Hagen Suzanne, Stark Diane, Glazener Cathryn, Sinclair Lesley, Ramsay Ian
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jan;20(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0726-4. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
Forty-seven women participated in a pilot study for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for women with prolapse. Women with symptomatic stage I or II prolapse [measured by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q)] were randomized to a 16-week physiotherapy intervention (PFMT and lifestyle advice; n = 23) or a control group receiving a lifestyle advice sheet (n = 24). Symptom severity and quality of life were measured via postal questionnaires. Blinded POP-Q was performed at baseline and follow-up. Intervention women had significantly greater improvement than controls in prolapse symptoms (mean score decrease 3.5 versus 0.1, p = 0.021), were significantly more likely to have an improved prolapse stage (45% versus 0%, p = 0.038) and were significantly more likely to say their prolapse was better (63% versus 24%, p = 0.012). The data support the feasibility of a substantive trial of PFMT for prolapse. A multi-centre trial is underway.
47名女性参与了一项关于盆底肌训练(PFMT)对脱垂女性有效性的多中心随机对照试验的初步研究。有症状的I期或II期脱垂女性[通过盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)测量]被随机分为16周的物理治疗干预组(PFMT和生活方式建议;n = 23)或接受生活方式建议表的对照组(n = 24)。通过邮寄问卷测量症状严重程度和生活质量。在基线和随访时进行盲法POP-Q。干预组女性在脱垂症状方面的改善明显大于对照组(平均得分下降3.5对0.1,p = 0.021),脱垂阶段改善的可能性明显更高(45%对0%,p = 0.038),并且更有可能表示她们的脱垂情况有所改善(63%对24%,p = 0.012)。数据支持对脱垂进行PFMT实质性试验的可行性。一项多中心试验正在进行中。