Suppr超能文献

氯沙坦-氢氯噻嗪两种不同薄膜包衣片制剂在健康志愿者中的生物等效性研究。

Bioequivalence study of two different film-coated tablet formulations of losartan-hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Neves Rita, Almeida Susana, Filipe Augusto, Spínola Ana Cristina Franco, Abolfathi Zohreh, Yritia Mercedes, Ortuño Jordi

机构信息

Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Prior Velho, Portugal.

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 2008;58(8):369-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296523.

Abstract

The study was conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two film-coated formulations containing 100 mg of losartan (CAS 124750-99-8) and 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide (CAS 58-93-5). Seventy-three healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomised, single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study, with a minimum washout period of 7 days. A total of 21 blood samples were collected up to 36 h post-dosing. Losartan, losartan carboxy acid and hydrochlorothiazide levels were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass detection (lower limit of quantification: 1.01 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide, 2.02 ng/mL for losartan and 2.51 ng/mL for losartan carboxy acid). Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment (AUC(0-t) and Cmax as primary and AUC(0-inf) as secondary pharmacokinetic parameters) were determined from the losartan and hydrochlorothiazide concentration data using non-compartmental analysis. Data from losartan carboxy acid was reported and presented as supportive data. The 90% confidence intervals (obtained by ANOVA) for losartan were 97.05-118.48% for Cmax 100.76-106.10% for AUC(0-t) and 100.80-106.10% for AUC(0-inf) whereas for hydrochlorothiazide the 90% confidence intervals obtained were 103.94-115.33% for Cmax, 101.97-109.61% for AUC(0-t) and 101.77-109.02% for AUC(0-inf), and for losartan carboxy acid the intervals obtained were 98.31-107.82% for Cmax, 97.89-104.30% for AUC(0-t) and 98.06-104.30% for AUC(0-inf). All the 90% confidence intervals obtained for all the parameters assessed were within the predefined ranges (80-125%). Based on these results, it can be concluded that the evaluated formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种薄膜包衣制剂的生物等效性,这两种制剂分别含有100 mg氯沙坦(CAS 124750-99-8)和12.5 mg氢氯噻嗪(CAS 58-93-5)。73名健康受试者参与了一项随机、单剂量、开放标签、双向交叉研究,最短洗脱期为7天。给药后36小时内共采集21份血样。采用液相色谱-串联质谱检测法测定氯沙坦、氯沙坦羧酸和氢氯噻嗪的水平(定量下限:氢氯噻嗪为1.01 ng/mL,氯沙坦为2.02 ng/mL,氯沙坦羧酸为2.51 ng/mL)。用于生物等效性评估的药代动力学参数(以AUC(0-t)和Cmax作为主要参数,AUC(0-inf)作为次要药代动力学参数)通过非房室分析从氯沙坦和氢氯噻嗪浓度数据中确定。氯沙坦羧酸的数据作为支持性数据进行报告和呈现。氯沙坦的90%置信区间(通过方差分析获得),Cmax为97.05-118.48%,AUC(0-t)为100.76-106.10%,AUC(0-inf)为100.80-106.10%;而氢氯噻嗪的90%置信区间,Cmax为103.94-115.33%,AUC(0-t)为101.97-109.61%,AUC(0-inf)为101.77-109.02%;氯沙坦羧酸的区间,Cmax为98.31-107.82%,AUC(0-t)为97.89-104.30%,AUC(0-inf)为98.06-104.30%。所有评估参数获得的90%置信区间均在预定义范围内(80-125%)。基于这些结果,可以得出结论,所评估的制剂在吸收速率和程度方面具有生物等效性。

相似文献

2
Combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide: in vivo bioequivalence.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):611-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297058.
3
Effect of the combination of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on the bioequivalence of tablet formulations.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):605-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297057.
4
Bioequivalence study of two different coated tablet formulations of finasteride in healthy volunteers.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2005;55(4):218-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296848.
5
Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of Losartan: bioequivalence assessment.
Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2005 Jul;26(5):205-10. doi: 10.1002/bdd.448.
9
Bioequivalence study of two different clopidogrel bisulfate film-coated tablets.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2009;59(6):297-302. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296400.

引用本文的文献

1
A Vector Theory of Assessing Clinical Trials: An Application to Bioequivalence.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jun 21;11(7):185. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070185.
2
An In Silico Approach toward the Appropriate Absorption Rate Metric in Bioequivalence.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 10;16(5):725. doi: 10.3390/ph16050725.
3
An In Vitro-In Vivo Simulation Approach for the Prediction of Bioequivalence.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 24;14(3):555. doi: 10.3390/ma14030555.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验