• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股浅动脉狭窄的自然病史。

The natural history of superficial femoral artery stenoses.

作者信息

Walsh D B, Gilbertson J J, Zwolak R M, Besso S, Edelman G C, Schneider J R, Cronenwett J L

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH 03756.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1991 Sep;14(3):299-304. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.30618.

DOI:10.1067/mva.1991.30618
PMID:1880837
Abstract

Since the natural history of specific superficial femoral artery stenoses is not known, we examined progression rates of superficial femoral artery stenoses in 45 lower extremities found when arteriograms were obtained of 38 patients for symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in the opposite leg or abdomen. These initial superficial femoral artery arteriograms were compared with later arteriograms in 25 limbs, duplex scans in 27 limbs, and both modalities in 7 limbs. After a mean interval of 37 months, most superficial femoral artery stenoses (72%) did not progress. However, 12 superficial femoral artery stenoses progressed (28%; mean follow-up, 37 months, including 7 that occluded (17%). Superficial femoral artery stenoses progressed among patients who complained of symptom progression at a rate faster than that among asymptomatic patients (15.6%/year vs 3%/year; p = 0.006). Superficial femoral artery lesions also progressed more rapidly among patients whose contralateral superficial femoral artery was occluded (10%/year vs 1.6%/year; p = 0.04). By multivariate regression analysis, symptom progression and smoking history were predictive of superficial femoral artery stenosis progression. In the seven patients whose superficial femoral artery stenoses progressed to occlusion, the average rate of stenosis progression was 12%/year (maximum predicted rate, 30% per year by 95% confidence limit). These results indicate that superficial femoral artery stenoses usually progress with synchronous symptomatic deterioration. Other than symptom progression, only cumulative smoking history and contralateral superficial femoral artery occlusion could be associated with superficial femoral artery stenosis progression in this small series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

由于特定股浅动脉狭窄的自然病程尚不清楚,我们对38例因对侧下肢或腹部症状性动脉粥样硬化疾病行血管造影时发现的45条下肢的股浅动脉狭窄进展率进行了研究。将这些最初的股浅动脉血管造影与随后25条肢体的血管造影、27条肢体的双功扫描以及7条肢体的两种检查方式进行了比较。平均间隔37个月后,大多数股浅动脉狭窄(72%)未进展。然而,12处股浅动脉狭窄出现进展(28%;平均随访37个月,其中7处闭塞(17%))。主诉症状进展的患者中股浅动脉狭窄进展速度快于无症状患者(15.6%/年对3%/年;p = 0.006)。对侧股浅动脉闭塞的患者中股浅动脉病变进展也更快(10%/年对1.6%/年;p = 0.04)。通过多变量回归分析,症状进展和吸烟史可预测股浅动脉狭窄进展。在7例股浅动脉狭窄进展至闭塞的患者中,狭窄进展的平均速率为12%/年(最大预测速率,95%置信区间为每年30%)。这些结果表明,股浅动脉狭窄通常随症状同步恶化而进展。在这个小系列研究中,除症状进展外,仅有累积吸烟史和对侧股浅动脉闭塞可能与股浅动脉狭窄进展相关。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
The natural history of superficial femoral artery stenoses.股浅动脉狭窄的自然病史。
J Vasc Surg. 1991 Sep;14(3):299-304. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.30618.
2
The natural history of duplex-detected stenosis after femoropopliteal endovascular therapy suggests questionable clinical utility of routine duplex surveillance.股腘动脉腔内治疗后双功能超声检测到的狭窄的自然病程表明常规双功能超声监测的临床实用性值得怀疑。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
Superficial femoral artery stenoses: characteristics of progressing lesions.股浅动脉狭窄:进展性病变的特征
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Mar;25(3):512-21. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70262-3.
4
Hemodynamic outcome of endovascular therapy for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus type B femoropopliteal arterial occlusive lesions.经导管主动脉腔内修复术治疗跨大西洋协作组B型股腘动脉闭塞性病变的血流动力学结果
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Feb;39(2):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.07.007.
5
Effect of multilevel sequential stenosis on lower extremity arterial duplex scanning.多级序贯狭窄对下肢动脉双功扫描的影响。
Am J Surg. 1995 Jun;169(6):564-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80221-9.
6
A prospective study of the natural history of femoropopliteal artery stenosis using duplex ultrasound.一项使用双功超声对股腘动脉狭窄自然病史的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993 Jul;7(4):444-7. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80264-6.
7
Incidentally detected stenoses proximal to grafts originating below the common femoral artery: do they affect graft patency or warrant repair in asymptomatic patients?在股总动脉以下起源的移植物近端偶然发现的狭窄:它们是否会影响移植物通畅性或需要对无症状患者进行修复?
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Dec;32(6):1180-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.109770.
8
Performance of ePTFE-covered endograft in patients with occlusive disease of the superficial femoral artery: a three-year clinical follow-up study.聚四氟乙烯覆膜血管内支架治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的疗效:一项三年临床随访研究
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Dec;51(6):783-90.
9
Incidence, time-of-onset, and anatomical distribution of recurrent stenoses after remote endarterectomy in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.股浅动脉闭塞性疾病远端动脉内膜切除术后再发狭窄的发生率、发病时间及解剖分布。
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Jul;30(1):106-13. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70182-5.
10
Hybrid surgical and endovascular therapy in multifocal peripheral TASC D lesions: up to three-year follow-up.多灶性外周TASC D病变的杂交手术与血管内治疗:长达三年的随访
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009 Aug;50(4):493-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review.外周动脉疾病:一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 11;15(6):e40267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40267. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Validating fatty acid binding protein 3 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for peripheral arterial disease: A three-year prospective follow-up study.验证脂肪酸结合蛋白3作为外周动脉疾病的诊断和预后生物标志物:一项为期三年的前瞻性随访研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec 13;55:101766. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101766. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
The progression rate of peripheral arterial disease in patients with intermittent claudication: a systematic review.
间歇性跛行患者外周动脉疾病的进展率:系统评价。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Aug 6;12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0351-0. eCollection 2019.
4
Long-term clinical outcome following lower limb arterial angioplasty.下肢动脉血管成形术后的长期临床结果。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Apr;93(3):250-4. doi: 10.1308/147870811X566394.