• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医院中360度评估方法的评估]

[Evaluation of the 360-degree assessment method in a hospital].

作者信息

Møller Lars Bo Krag, Ejlskov Morten Wolff

机构信息

Hvidovre Hospital, Udviklings- og Uddannelsesafdelingen, Afsnit 046, Kettegårds Alle 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Sep 15;170(38):2973-6.

PMID:18808752
Abstract

The present study examines the acceptability of the 360-degree assessment method as a means for evaluating the management and leadership competencies of the clinical staff of a university hospital. Twenty-eight consultants and registered nurses underwent evaluation. One group had debriefing with management consultants, the other with the head of the clinical department. Two months later, the applicability of the method was assessed. The strengths and weaknesses of the leaders were exposed, and areas for improvement were made visible, and acceptance of the method was widespread. Anonymity was required. The group coached by management consultants tended to benefit the most from the evaluation. Using a web-based solution to collect the data was unproblematic.

摘要

本研究探讨了360度评估方法作为评估大学医院临床工作人员管理和领导能力手段的可接受性。28名顾问和注册护士接受了评估。一组与管理顾问进行了汇报,另一组与临床科室主任进行了汇报。两个月后,评估了该方法的适用性。领导者的优势和劣势得以暴露,改进领域也清晰可见,该方法得到了广泛认可。要求保持匿名。由管理顾问指导的小组往往从评估中受益最多。使用基于网络的解决方案收集数据没有问题。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the 360-degree assessment method in a hospital].[医院中360度评估方法的评估]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Sep 15;170(38):2973-6.
2
[Method for evaluating the competence of specialists--the validation of 360-degree-questionnaire].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Apr 19;172(16):1201-6.
3
A qualitative study of charge nurse competencies.护士长能力的质性研究。
Medsurg Nurs. 2003 Oct;12(5):298-305; quiz 306.
4
Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.医生对 360 度反馈为何有效(无效)的看法:一项定性研究。
Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):874-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x.
5
To have and to hold: personnel shortage in a Finnish healthcare organisation.拥有并坚守:芬兰医疗保健组织的人员短缺。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Jul;38(5):518-23. doi: 10.1177/1403494810370231. Epub 2010 May 19.
6
Assessing new graduate nurse performance.评估新毕业护士的表现。
J Nurs Adm. 2008 Nov;38(11):468-74. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000339477.50219.06.
7
[Clinical leaders' and staff's assessment of the current quality related to the patient pathways and expectations of and knowledge about accreditation--a baseline evaluation in Copenhagen County].[临床领导者和工作人员对当前与患者就医流程相关的质量评估以及对认证的期望和了解——哥本哈根郡的基线评估]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Nov 13;168(46):3993-7.
8
Mass casualty incidents: are NHS staff prepared? An audit of one NHS foundation trust.
Emerg Med J. 2008 Sep;25(9):562-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.050658.
9
Accuracy of medical staff assessment of trainees' operative performance.医务人员对实习生手术操作表现评估的准确性。
Med Teach. 2005 Nov;27(7):634-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590500251175.
10
[Quality assurance and prevention of transfusion risks].[输血风险的质量保证与预防]
Rev Infirm. 2007 Jan-Feb(127):38-40.