Edlow Jonathan A, Panagos Peter D, Godwin Steven A, Thomas Tamara L, Decker Wyatt W
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):407-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.001.
This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is an update of a 2002 clinical policy on the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute, nontraumatic headache. A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following 5 critical questions: (1) Does a response to therapy predict the etiology of an acute headache? (2) Which patients with headache require neuroimaging in the ED? (3) Does lumbar puncture need to be routinely performed on ED patients being worked up for nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage whose noncontrast brain computed tomography (CT) scans are interpreted as normal? (4) In which adult patients with a complaint of headache can a lumbar puncture be safely performed without a neuroimaging study? (5) Is there a need for further emergent diagnostic imaging in the patient with sudden-onset, severe headache who has negative findings in both CT and lumbar puncture? Evidence was graded and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.
美国急诊医师学会的这项临床政策是对2002年关于成年急性非创伤性头痛患者到急诊科(ED)就诊的评估和管理的临床政策的更新。一个撰写小组委员会对文献进行了审查,以得出基于证据的建议,帮助临床医生回答以下5个关键问题:(1)治疗反应能否预测急性头痛的病因?(2)哪些头痛患者在急诊科需要进行神经影像学检查?(3)对于非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血且非增强脑部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果为正常的急诊科患者,是否需要常规进行腰椎穿刺?(4)哪些主诉头痛的成年患者在不进行神经影像学检查的情况下可以安全地进行腰椎穿刺?(5)对于CT和腰椎穿刺结果均为阴性的突发严重头痛患者,是否需要进一步进行紧急诊断性影像学检查?根据医学文献中现有数据的强度对证据进行分级并给出建议。