Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):709-720. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13569. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
To examine the effect of an employer-mandated switch to high-deductible health plans (HDHP) on emergency department (ED) low-value imaging.
Claims data of a large national insurer between 2003 and 2014.
Difference-in-differences analysis with matched control groups.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The primary outcome is low-value imaging during ED visits for syncope, headache, or low back pain. We included members aged 19-63 years whose employers offered only low-deductible (≤$500) plans for one (baseline) year and, in the next (follow-up) year, offered only HDHPs (≥$1000). Contemporaneous members whose employers offered only low-deductible plans for two consecutive years served as controls. The groups were matched by person and employer propensity for HDHP switch, employer size, baseline calendar year, and baseline year quarterly number of total and imaged ED visits for each condition. We modeled the visit-level probability of low-value imaging using multivariable logistic regression with member-clustered standard errors. We also calculated population level monthly cumulative ED visit rates and modeled their trends using generalized linear regression adjusting for serial autocorrelation.
After matching, we included 524 998 members in the HDHP group and 5 448 803 in the control group with a mean age of approximately 42 years and 48% female in both groups. On visit-level analyses, there were no significant differential changes in the probability of low-value imaging use in the HDHP and control groups. In population-level analyses, compared with control group members, members who switched to HDHPs experienced a relative decrease of 5.9% (95% CI - 10.3, -1.6) in ED visits for the study conditions and a relative decrease of 5.1% (95%CI -9.6, -0.6) in the subset of ED visits with low-value imaging.
Though HDHP switches decreased ED utilization, they had no significant effect on low-value imaging use after patients have decided to seek ED care.
研究雇主强制推行高免赔额健康计划(HDHP)对急诊(ED)低价值影像的影响。
2003 年至 2014 年期间一家大型全国保险公司的索赔数据。
采用匹配对照组的差分分析。
数据收集/提取方法:主要结局是 ED 就诊时因晕厥、头痛或腰痛进行的低价值影像。我们纳入了年龄在 19-63 岁之间的成员,他们的雇主在第一年只提供低免赔额(≤500 美元)的计划,第二年只提供高免赔额(≥1000 美元)的计划。同期雇主只连续两年提供低免赔额计划的成员作为对照组。这些组通过个人和雇主向 HDHP 转换的倾向、雇主规模、基线日历年以及每个条件下基线年度季度总和影像 ED 就诊次数进行匹配。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,成员聚类标准误差,对就诊层面低价值影像的可能性进行建模。我们还计算了每月累计 ED 就诊率的人群水平,并使用广义线性回归调整序列自相关来模拟其趋势。
匹配后,我们纳入了 524998 名 HDHP 组和 5448803 名对照组的成员,两组的平均年龄约为 42 岁,女性比例均为 48%。在就诊层面分析中,HDHP 和对照组的低价值影像使用概率均无显著差异变化。在人群层面分析中,与对照组成员相比,转向 HDHP 的成员在研究条件下的 ED 就诊率相对下降了 5.9%(95%CI-10.3,-1.6),在 ED 就诊中低价值影像的就诊率相对下降了 5.1%(95%CI-9.6,-0.6)。
尽管 HDHP 转换降低了 ED 的利用率,但在患者决定寻求 ED 护理后,对低价值影像的使用没有显著影响。