Chimura T, Satou S, Funayama T, Oono T, Sakai Y, Morisaki N, Kanasugi H, Takahashi H, Saitou N, Miyata R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Yamagata University.
Jpn J Antibiot. 1991 Mar;44(3):337-44.
Clinical effects of combined use of aztreonam (AZT), amikacin (AMK) and clindamycin (CLDM) in 46 cases with infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology were retrospectively studied in 2 groups, and the following results were obtained. 1. No significant difference in efficacy rates was noted between AZT plus CLDM treated group (n = 25) and AMK plus CLDM treated group (n = 21) (96.0% vs. 95.2%), while rate of excellent efficacy was slightly higher in AZT plus CLDM group than AMK plus CLDM group (24.0% vs. 14.3%). 2. No significant difference in bacteriological clinical effects was also noted between the 2 groups, while bacteriological eradication rate was higher in the AZT plus CLDM group than in the other group (76.2% vs. 50.0%), and the difference was particularly clear in the eradication rates of aerobic, Gram-negative bacteria (88.9% vs. 30.0%). 3. Subjective and objective side effects, and abnormalities of clinical test results were not found in either group.
回顾性研究了氨曲南(AZT)、阿米卡星(AMK)和克林霉素(CLDM)联合使用对46例妇产科传染病患者的临床疗效,分为2组,结果如下:1. AZT加CLDM治疗组(n = 25)和AMK加CLDM治疗组(n = 21)的有效率无显著差异(96.0%对95.2%),而AZT加CLDM组的优效率略高于AMK加CLDM组(24.0%对14.3%)。2. 两组间细菌学临床疗效也无显著差异,而AZT加CLDM组的细菌清除率高于另一组(76.2%对50.0%),在需氧革兰氏阴性菌的清除率方面差异尤为明显(88.9%对30.0%)。3. 两组均未发现主观和客观副作用以及临床检查结果异常。