Zheng Z, Keifer J
Neuroscience Group, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA.
Neuroscience. 2008 Oct 28;156(4):872-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.042. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
Protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathways have been implicated in mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and learning, however, the roles of the different PKC family isoforms remain to be clarified. Previous studies showed that NMDAR-mediated trafficking of GluR4-containing AMPARs supports conditioning and that the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) have a central role in the synaptic delivery of GluR4 subunits. Here, an in vitro model of classical conditioning in pond turtles, Pseudemys scripta elegans, was used to assess the role of PKC isoforms in mechanisms underlying this form of learning. We show that the PKC antagonists chelerythrine and bisindolylmaleimide I attenuated conditioned response (CR) acquisition and expression, as did the PKCzeta pseudosubstrate peptide inhibitor ZIP. Analysis of protein expression revealed that PKCzeta is activated in early stages of conditioning followed shortly afterward by increased levels of PKCalpha/beta and activation of ERK MAPK. Data also suggest that PKCzeta is upstream from and activates ERK. Finally, protein localization studies using confocal imaging indicate that inhibitors of ERK, but not PKC, suppress colocalization of GluR1 with synaptophysin while inhibitors of PKC and ERK attenuate colocalization of GluR4 with synaptophysin. Together, these data suggest that acquisition of conditioning proceeds by two stages of AMPAR trafficking. The first is PKC-independent and ERK-dependent synaptic delivery of GluR1 subunits to activate silent synapses. This is followed by PKC-dependent and ERK-dependent synthesis and delivery of GluR4 subunits that supports the acquisition of CRs. Therefore, there is a selective role for PKC and MAPK signaling pathways in multistep AMPAR trafficking that mediates acquisition of classical conditioning.
蛋白激酶C(PKC)信号转导通路与突触可塑性及学习机制有关,然而,不同PKC家族亚型的作用仍有待阐明。先前的研究表明,NMDAR介导的含GluR4的AMPARs转运支持条件作用,且丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPKs)在GluR4亚基的突触传递中起核心作用。在此,利用秀丽锦龟(Pseudemys scripta elegans)经典条件作用的体外模型来评估PKC亚型在这种学习形式的潜在机制中的作用。我们发现,PKC拮抗剂白屈菜红碱和双吲哚马来酰胺I以及PKCζ假底物肽抑制剂ZIP均可减弱条件反应(CR)的获得和表达。蛋白质表达分析显示,PKCζ在条件作用的早期被激活,随后不久PKCα/β水平升高且ERK MAPK被激活。数据还表明,PKCζ位于ERK上游并激活ERK。最后,利用共聚焦成像进行的蛋白质定位研究表明,ERK抑制剂而非PKC抑制剂可抑制GluR1与突触小泡蛋白的共定位,而PKC和ERK抑制剂则减弱GluR4与突触小泡蛋白的共定位。总之,这些数据提示,条件作用的获得通过AMPAR转运的两个阶段进行。第一个阶段是GluR1亚基的PKC非依赖性和ERK依赖性突触传递,以激活沉默突触。随后是PKC依赖性和ERK依赖性的GluR4亚基合成与传递,这支持CRs的获得。因此,PKC和MAPK信号通路在介导经典条件作用获得的多步骤AMPAR转运中具有选择性作用。