van Otterloo Sandra G, van der Leij Aryan, Henrichs Lotte F
Department of Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dyslexia. 2009 Aug;15(3):187-217. doi: 10.1002/dys.376.
Dutch children at higher familial risk of reading disability received a home-based intervention programme before formal reading instruction started to investigate whether this would reduce the risk of dyslexia. The experimental group (n=23) received a specific training in phoneme awareness and letter knowledge. A control group (n=25) received a non-specific training in morphology, syntax, and vocabulary. Both interventions were designed to take 10 min a day, 5 days a week for 10 weeks. Most parents were sufficiently able to work with the programme properly. At post-test the experimental group had gained more on phoneme awareness than the control group. The control group gained more on one of the morphology measures. On average, these specific training results did not lead to significant group differences in first-grade reading and spelling measures. However, fewer experimental children scored below 10th percentile on word recognition.
荷兰有较高家族性阅读障碍风险的儿童在正式阅读教学开始前接受了一项家庭干预计划,以调查这是否会降低诵读困难的风险。实验组(n = 23)接受了音素意识和字母知识的专项训练。对照组(n = 25)接受了形态学、句法和词汇方面的非专项训练。两种干预措施均设计为每天10分钟,每周5天,持续10周。大多数家长有足够能力正确实施该计划。在测试后,实验组在音素意识方面的进步比对照组更大。对照组在一项形态学指标上进步更大。平均而言,这些专项训练结果并未在一年级阅读和拼写指标上导致显著的组间差异。然而,在单词识别方面得分低于第10百分位的实验组儿童较少。