Suppr超能文献

中毒住院与中毒控制中心的呼叫频率相关。

Poisoning hospitalization correlates with poison center call frequency.

作者信息

Albertson Timothy, Tharratt R Steven, Marquardt Kathy, Alsop Judith, Ninomiya John, Foulke Garrett

机构信息

California Poison Control System, Sacramento Division, Sacramento, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep;4(3):151-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03161193.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Poison Control Centers (PCCs) have been shown to reduce health expenditures by reducing emergency department and clinic visits. The effect or association of PCC call frequency on acute hospitalization rates for poisonings has not been studied extensively.

METHODS

All nonfederal hospital discharges for acute poisoning principal diagnosis codes (960-979, 980-989, 9956X, 3030, and 005) in California between October 1999 and June 2002 were examined. Approximately 3.3% of the discharges had county/hospital information suppressed in the public-use database because of confidentiality criteria and were excluded from the analysis. U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for appropriate years by counties were also obtained. The 58 California counties were condensed to 48 counties and 3 "small-county" geographic groupings. Exposure calls by counties/groupings to the California Poison Control System(CPCS) for the same period were tabulated.

RESULTS

In California, rates of hospital discharges for poisoning averaged 0.54/1000 person years with a range of 0.25/1000 person years (Central Counties) to 1.53/1000 person years (Del Norte County). Poison call rates averaged 8.5/1000 person years with a range of 4.9/1000 person years (Los Angeles County) to 19.6/1000 person years (Napa County). Poisoning discharges per 1000 person years positively correlated with PCC calls per 1000 person years (Spearman correlation 0.41, p = 0.0003). The average hospital length of stay (LOS) did not correlate with PCC call frequency or poisoning discharges per 1000 person years.

CONCLUSION

The CPCS call frequency or county penetrance was not correlated with a reduction in the number of hospitalizations for poisoning nor was it associated with reduced average LOS in this study. Further study is needed to understand the etiology of the large differences in county rates of poisoning hospitalization and average LOS.

摘要

引言

中毒控制中心(PCCs)已被证明可通过减少急诊科和门诊就诊次数来降低医疗费用。PCC呼叫频率对中毒急性住院率的影响或关联尚未得到广泛研究。

方法

对1999年10月至2002年6月期间加利福尼亚州所有以急性中毒为主诊断编码(960 - 979、980 - 989、9956X、3030和005)的非联邦医院出院病例进行了检查。由于保密标准,约3.3%的出院病例在公共使用数据库中县/医院信息被屏蔽,因此被排除在分析之外。还获取了美国人口普查局按县划分的相应年份的人口估计数。加利福尼亚州的58个县被合并为48个县和3个“小县”地理分组。统计了同期各县/分组向加利福尼亚中毒控制系统(CPCS)的暴露呼叫次数。

结果

在加利福尼亚州,中毒的医院出院率平均为0.54/1000人年,范围从0.25/1000人年(中部各县)到1.53/1000人年(德尔诺特县)。中毒呼叫率平均为8.5/1000人年,范围从4.9/1000人年(洛杉矶县)到19.6/1000人年(纳帕县)。每1000人年的中毒出院人数与每1000人年的PCC呼叫次数呈正相关(斯皮尔曼相关性为0.41,p = 0.0003)。平均住院时间(LOS)与PCC呼叫频率或每1000人年的中毒出院人数无关。

结论

在本研究中,CPCS呼叫频率或县渗透率与中毒住院人数的减少无关,也与平均住院时间的缩短无关。需要进一步研究以了解各县中毒住院率和平均住院时间存在巨大差异的病因。

相似文献

1
Poisoning hospitalization correlates with poison center call frequency.
J Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep;4(3):151-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03161193.
2
The potential impact of poison control centers on rural hospitalization rates for poisoning.
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):2094-100. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1585.
3
Costs of poisoning in the United States and savings from poison control centers: a benefit-cost analysis.
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Feb;29(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70275-0.
4
The impact of poison control centers on poisoning-related visits to EDs--United States, 2003.
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Mar;26(3):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.014.
5
Regional variations in the use and awareness of the California Poison Control System.
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(5):625-33. doi: 10.1081/clt-200026964.
7
Poison-related visits in a pediatric emergency department: A retrospective analysis of patients who bypass poison control centers.
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1554-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158418. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
Trends in gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and related drug intoxication: 1999 to 2003.
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.012. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
10
The impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay for patients with poisoning.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Jan 15;70(2):107-10. doi: 10.1080/15287390600755042.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Poison control center surge capacity during an unusual increase in call volume--results from a natural experiment.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):55-8. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00004349.
2
The potential impact of poison control centers on rural hospitalization rates for poisoning.
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):2094-100. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1585.
3
Assessment of barriers to utilization of poison centers by Hispanic/Latino populations.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Sep;69(18):1711-8. doi: 10.1080/15287390600631201.
4
2004 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System.
Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;23(5):589-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.05.001.
5
Association between sociodemographic factors and exposures and utilization of poison centers in Texas, 1998-2002.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 May 28;68(10):755-61. doi: 10.1080/15287390590930153.
6
Seasonal changes in poisoning exposures reported to a regional poison center from coastal resort areas.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 Mar 12;68(5):315-8. doi: 10.1080/15287390590900732.
7
Pattern of acute poisonings in Mashhad, Iran 1993-2000.
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(7):965-75. doi: 10.1081/clt-200042550.
8
Regional variations in the use and awareness of the California Poison Control System.
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(5):625-33. doi: 10.1081/clt-200026964.
10
Reaffirmed cost-effectiveness of poison centers.
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;41(1):159-60. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.45.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验