Rhodes Tim, Treloar Carla
Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
Addiction. 2008 Oct;103(10):1593-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02306.x.
Intervention impact on reductions in hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence among injecting drug users (IDUs) are modest. There is a need to explore how drug injectors' interpret HCV risk.
To review English-language qualitative empirical studies of HCV risk among IDUs.
Qualitative synthesis using a meta-ethnographic approach. Searching of eight electronic databases and reference lists identified manually papers in peer-reviewed journals since 2000. Only studies investigating IDU perspectives on HCV risk were included. Themes across studies were identified systematically and compared, leading to a synthesis of second- and third-order constructs.
We included 31 papers, representing 24 studies among over 1000 IDUs. Seven themes were generated: risk ubiquity; relative viral risk; knowledge uncertainty; hygiene and the body; trust and intimacy; risk environment; and the individualization of risk responsibility. Evidence supports a perception of HCV as a risk accepted rather than avoided. HCV was perceived largely as socially accommodated and expected, and in relative terms to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as the 'master status' of viral dangers. Symbolic knowledge systems, rather than biomedical risk calculus, and especially narratives of hygiene and trust, played a primary role in shaping interpretations of HCV risk. Critical factors in the risk environment included policing, homelessness and gendered risk.
Appealing to risk calculus alone is insufficient. Interventions should build upon the salience of hygiene and trust narratives in HCV risk rationality, and foster community changes towards the perceived preventability of HCV. Structural interventions in harm reduction should target policing, homelessness and gendered risk.
干预措施对降低注射吸毒者(IDU)丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率的影响不大。有必要探讨吸毒者如何理解丙型肝炎病毒风险。
综述关于注射吸毒者丙型肝炎病毒风险的英文定性实证研究。
采用元民族志方法进行定性综合分析。检索了八个电子数据库,并人工查阅了自2000年以来同行评审期刊上的参考文献列表。仅纳入调查注射吸毒者对丙型肝炎病毒风险看法的研究。系统识别并比较各项研究中的主题,从而综合出二阶和三阶结构。
我们纳入了31篇论文,代表了对1000多名注射吸毒者开展的24项研究。共生成了七个主题:风险无处不在;相对病毒风险;知识不确定性;卫生与身体;信任与亲密关系;风险环境;以及风险责任个体化。有证据支持这样一种观念,即丙型肝炎病毒风险是被接受而非被规避的。丙型肝炎病毒在很大程度上被视为社会所包容和预期的,相对而言,与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)相比,它被视为病毒危险中的“主要地位”。象征意义的知识体系,而非生物医学风险计算,尤其是卫生和信任的叙述,在塑造对丙型肝炎病毒风险的理解方面发挥了主要作用。风险环境中的关键因素包括治安、无家可归和性别风险。
仅依靠风险计算是不够的。干预措施应基于卫生和信任叙述在丙型肝炎病毒风险合理性中的突出地位,并促进社区朝着认为丙型肝炎病毒可预防的方向转变。减少伤害的结构性干预措施应针对治安、无家可归和性别风险。