Ilmberger Josef, Ruge Maximilian, Kreth Friedrich-Wilhelm, Briegel Josef, Reulen Hans-Juergen, Tonn Joerg-Christian
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
J Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;109(4):583-92. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0583.
This prospective longitudinally designed study was conducted to evaluate language functions pre- and postoperatively in patients who underwent microsurgical treatment of tumors in close proximity to or within language areas and to detect those patients at risk for a postoperative aphasic disturbance.
Between 1991 and 2005, 153 awake craniotomies with subsequent cortical mapping of language functions were performed in 149 patients. Language functions were assessed using a standardized test battery. Risk factors were obtained from multivariate logistic regression models.
Language mapping was able to be performed in all patients, and complete tumor resection was achieved in 48.4%. Within 21 days after surgery a new language deficit (aphasic disturbance) was observed in 41 (32%) of the 128 cases without preoperative deficits. There were a total of 60 cases involving postoperative aphasic disturbances, including cases both with and without preoperative disturbances. Risk factors for postoperative aphasic disturbance were preoperative aphasia (p<0.0002), intraoperative complications (p<0.02), language-positive sites within the tumor (p<0.001), and nonfrontal lesion location (p<0.001). In patients without a preoperative deficit, a normal (yet submaximal) naming performance was a powerful predictor for an early postoperative aphasic disturbance (p<0.0003). Seven months after treatment 10.9% of the 128 cases without preoperative aphasic disturbances continued to demonstrate new postoperative language disturbances. A total of 17.6% of all cases demonstrated new postoperative language disturbances after 7 months. Risk factors for persistent aphasic disturbance were increased age (>40 years, p<0.02) and preoperative aphasia (p<0.001).
Every attempt should be undertaken to preserve language-relevant areas intraoperatively, even when they are located within the tumor. New postoperative deficits resolve in the majority of patients, which may be a result of cortical mapping as well as functional reorganization.
本前瞻性纵向设计研究旨在评估在语言区域附近或内部进行肿瘤显微手术治疗的患者术前和术后的语言功能,并检测有术后失语障碍风险的患者。
1991年至2005年期间,对149例患者进行了153次清醒开颅手术及随后的语言功能皮层定位。使用标准化测试组合评估语言功能。危险因素来自多变量逻辑回归模型。
所有患者均能进行语言定位,48.4%的患者实现了肿瘤完全切除。在128例术前无语言缺陷的病例中,41例(32%)在术后21天内出现了新的语言缺陷(失语障碍)。共有60例涉及术后失语障碍,包括术前有和无失语障碍的病例。术后失语障碍的危险因素为术前失语(p<0.0002)、术中并发症(p<0.02)、肿瘤内语言阳性部位(p<0.001)和非额叶病变位置(p<0.001)。在术前无语言缺陷的患者中,正常(但未达最佳)的命名表现是术后早期失语障碍的有力预测指标(p<0.0003)。治疗7个月后,128例术前无失语障碍的病例中有10.9%继续出现新的术后语言障碍。所有病例中有17.6%在7个月后出现新的术后语言障碍。持续性失语障碍的危险因素为年龄增加(>40岁,p<0.02)和术前失语(p<0.001)。
术中应尽一切努力保留与语言相关的区域,即使它们位于肿瘤内。大多数患者术后新出现的缺陷会得到解决,这可能是皮层定位以及功能重组的结果。