• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉狭窄:单枚西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术前斑块减容的影响

Unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis: impact of plaque debulking prior to single sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

作者信息

Tanaka Nobuyoshi, Terashima Mitsuyasu, Kinoshita Yoshihisa, Kimura Masashi, Nasu Kenya, Ehara Mariko, Tsuchikane Etsuo, Matsubara Tetsuo, Asakura Yasushi, Katoh Osamu, Suzuki Takahiko

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, 21-1 Gobudori, Oyama-cho, Toyohashi, 441-8530, Japan.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Oct;20(10):505-10.

PMID:18829993
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of plaque debulking with directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) prior to single sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in an unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) involving bifurcation stenosis has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

One hundred and one patients with unprotected LMCA bifurcation lesions treated with single SES implantation (from the LMCA to the left descending coronary artery [LAD] across the left circumflex artery [LCx] ostium) were divided into 2 groups: DCA group (n = 41, plaque debulking with DCA prior to SES implantation) and non-DCA group (n = 60, single SES implantation alone). Clinical outcomes as well as angiographic data at baseline, post procedure and follow up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 1-year follow up, freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 97.4 +/- 2.6% in the DCA group, and 88.6 +/- 4.4% in the non-DCA group (p = 0.129). Baseline quantitative coronary angiographic analyses revealed that the percent diameter stenosis (%DS) of the LCx was higher in the DCA group than in the non-DCA group (36.8 +/- 21.5% vs. 26.9 +/- 19.2%; p = 0.029). Moreover, the %DS of the LCx after PCI and at 9-month follow up was lower in the DCA group (19.2 +/- 13.1% vs. 28.3 +/- 22.7%; p = 0.034; 20.8 +/- 12.3% vs. 31.9 +/- 21.4%; p = 0.007, respectively). Furthermore, restenosis at the LCx ostium was not observed in the DCA group, but was seen in 5 cases in the non-DCA group (0% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Plaque debulking with DCA prior to single SES implantation effectively reduced restenosis of the LCx ostium in this challenging lesion subset.

摘要

背景

在未受保护的左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)合并分叉狭窄处,先采用定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术(DCA)进行斑块减容,再植入单枚西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)的影响尚未得到充分评估。

方法

101例接受单枚SES植入治疗(从LMCA穿过左旋支动脉[LCx]开口至左冠状动脉前降支[LAD])的未受保护的LMCA分叉病变患者被分为两组:DCA组(n = 41,在SES植入前用DCA进行斑块减容)和非DCA组(n = 60,仅行单枚SES植入)。比较两组的临床结局以及基线、术后和随访时的血管造影数据。

结果

在1年随访时,DCA组主要不良心脏事件无发生率为97.4±2.6%,非DCA组为88.6±4.4%(p = 0.129)。基线定量冠状动脉血管造影分析显示,DCA组LCx的直径狭窄百分比(%DS)高于非DCA组(36.8±21.5%对26.9±19.2%;p = 0.029)。此外,DCA组PCI后及9个月随访时LCx的%DS较低(分别为19.2±13.1%对28.3±22.7%;p = 0.034;20.8±12.3%对31.9±21.4%;p = 0.007)。此外,DCA组未观察到LCx开口处再狭窄,但非DCA组有5例出现再狭窄(0%对10.2%;p = 0.048)。

结论

在单枚SES植入前用DCA进行斑块减容可有效降低这一具有挑战性的病变亚组中LCx开口处的再狭窄。

相似文献

1
Unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis: impact of plaque debulking prior to single sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉狭窄:单枚西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术前斑块减容的影响
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Oct;20(10):505-10.
2
Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.用于无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的紫杉醇洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 12;53(19):1760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.035.
3
Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Zotarolimus eluting stents to treat bifurcated lesions: a 7-month clinical outcome comparison.西罗莫司、他克莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:7个月临床结果比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):35-42.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的长期临床结局:MAIN-COMPARE(无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄血运重建:经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与外科血运重建比较)注册研究分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.071.
5
Firebird and cypher sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in treatment of very long coronary lesions.火鸟和西罗莫司洗脱 Cypher 支架及裸金属支架治疗极长冠状动脉病变
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 20;121(16):1518-23.
6
Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses: long-term results of the DIABETES trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术对初发冠状动脉狭窄糖尿病患者的长期临床益处:糖尿病(DIABETES)试验的长期结果
Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(16):1946-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm197. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
7
Impact of drug-eluting stent selection on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the sirolimus vs paclitaxel drug-eluting stent for left main registry (SP-DELFT).药物洗脱支架选择对无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者长期临床结局的影响:左主干登记处的西罗莫司与紫杉醇药物洗脱支架(SP-DELFT)。
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Sep 11;137(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
8
Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄患者的长期临床获益:RIBS-II(支架内再狭窄:球囊血管成形术与择期西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 11;52(20):1621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025.
9
Long-term outcomes following drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Apr 5;120(7):545-51.
10
The clinical outcome of percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in multivessel coronary artery disease with the sirolimus-eluting stent: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II).
Eur Heart J. 2007 Feb;28(4):433-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl539. Epub 2007 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Two Different Rota-Flush Solutions in Patients Undergoing Rotational Atherectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blind Trial.两种不同旋磨冲洗液在接受旋磨术患者中的比较:一项随机、对照、三盲试验
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):531-543. doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00279-1. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Vascular Response after Directional Coronary Atherectomy for Left Main Bifurcation Lesion.左主干分叉病变定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术后的血管反应。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Dec 14;2021:5541843. doi: 10.1155/2021/5541843. eCollection 2021.
3
Novel strategy for ostial left anterior descending artery acute myocardial infarction: Combined treatment with directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
左前降支开口处急性心肌梗死的新策略:定向冠状动脉斑块旋切术联合药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Jan 12;9(3):1095-1100. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3659. eCollection 2021 Mar.