Jensen Lisette Okkels, Maeng Michael, Thayssen Per, Christiansen Evald Hoej, Hansen Knud Noerregaard, Galloe Anders, Kelbaek Henning, Lassen Jens Flensted, Thuesen Leif
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Eur Heart J. 2008 Nov;29(22):2733-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn434. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
Patients with diabetes have increased risk of in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation owing to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH). The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent and distribution of NIH with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) after coronary artery stenting with sirolimus-eluting (Cypher) or paclitaxel-eluting (Taxus) stents in diabetic patients.
One hundred and thirty diabetic patients were randomized to Cypher or Taxus stent implantation. IVUS was performed at 8 month follow-up. NIH volume was significantly reduced in the Cypher group when compared with the Taxus group: median (inter-quartile range) 0.0 (0.0-0.0) vs. 8.0 mm(3) (0.1-33.0), P < 0.001. Per cent NIH volume was also significantly lower in Cypher stents compared with Taxus stents: median (inter-quartile range) 0.0 (0.0-0.0) vs. 7.5% (0.1-27.0), P < 0.001. NIH was covering 5.4% of the stent length in the Cypher stents compared with 46.1% in the Taxus stents (P < 0.001). The incidence of diffuse NIH was significantly higher for Taxus than for Cypher stents (42.9 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001). Taxus stents had more often NIH at the proximal stent edge compared with Cypher stents (45.1 vs. 7%, P < 0.001) and no Cypher stents had NIH at the distal stent edge compared with 35.5% of the Taxus stents (P < 0.001).
In diabetic patients, the Cypher stent, compared with the Taxus stent, inhibited NIH more effectively and had a more focal NIH pattern including less involvement of the stent edges.
由于新生内膜增生(NIH),糖尿病患者冠状动脉支架植入术后发生支架内再狭窄的风险增加。本研究的目的是在糖尿病患者中,使用血管内超声(IVUS)评估西罗莫司洗脱(Cypher)支架或紫杉醇洗脱(Taxus)支架冠状动脉支架植入术后NIH的程度和分布情况。
130例糖尿病患者被随机分为接受Cypher支架或Taxus支架植入组。在随访8个月时进行IVUS检查。与Taxus组相比,Cypher组的NIH体积显著减小:中位数(四分位间距)为0.0(0.0 - 0.0)mm³ 对比8.0 mm³(0.1 - 33.0),P < 0.001。与Taxus支架相比,Cypher支架的NIH体积百分比也显著更低:中位数(四分位间距)为0.0(0.0 - 0.0)对比7.5%(0.1 - 27.0),P < 0.001。Cypher支架中NIH覆盖支架长度的5.4%,而Taxus支架中为46.1%(P < 0.001)。Taxus支架弥漫性NIH的发生率显著高于Cypher支架(42.9%对比3.5%,P < 0.001)。与Cypher支架相比,Taxus支架在支架近端边缘更常出现NIH(45.1%对比7%,P < 0.001),且没有Cypher支架在支架远端边缘出现NIH,而Taxus支架为35.5%(P < 0.001)。
在糖尿病患者中,与Taxus支架相比,Cypher支架能更有效地抑制NIH,且具有更局限的NIH模式,包括支架边缘受累较少。