• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肝门部Glisson鞘入路在解剖性肝段切除术中处理血管-分泌结构]

[Hilar glissonean access to vascular-secretory elements in anatomical segmental liver resections].

作者信息

Vishnevskiĭ V A, Efanov M G, Ikramov R Z, Shevchenko T V, Melekhina O V, Kozyrin I A

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2008(9):33-40.

PMID:18833181
Abstract

It still remains unclear which patients with hepatic tumors can favour anatomical segmental liver resections instead of major liver resection. Short term results of anatomical segmental liver resection are evaluated and analyzed. Ten patients underwent the anatomical segmental liver resection performed by posterior approach with taping of anterior right hepatic vein. Seven patients had liver metastases of colorectal cancer, one had primary hepatic carcinoma and two had benign lesions, anatomical segmental liver resection were performed without Pringle maneuver. There was no significant difference in blood loss, duration of the procedure, postoperative hospital stay and morbidity in comparison with the segmental liver resection performed by anterior approach. Multiple, large and deep-embedded lesions were removed completely, with tumor-free resection margins. Anatomical segmental liver resection performed by hilar glissonean approach is recommended in patients with compromised liver function "unfavourable" liver anatomy to replace major liver resection provides removal of only affected part of the liver accordingly to its true anatomical borders.

摘要

目前仍不清楚哪些肝肿瘤患者适合进行解剖性肝段切除术而非肝大部切除术。对解剖性肝段切除术的短期结果进行了评估和分析。10例患者接受了经后入路并结扎右肝前静脉的解剖性肝段切除术。7例为结直肠癌肝转移,1例为原发性肝癌,2例为良性病变,均在未进行Pringle手法的情况下进行了解剖性肝段切除术。与经前入路的肝段切除术相比,术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间及并发症发生率无显著差异。多个、较大且深埋的病变被完全切除,切缘无肿瘤残留。对于肝功能受损、“肝脏解剖结构不佳”的患者,建议采用肝门Glisson鞘入路进行解剖性肝段切除术以替代肝大部切除术,从而仅根据肝脏的真实解剖边界切除肝脏的受累部分。

相似文献

1
[Hilar glissonean access to vascular-secretory elements in anatomical segmental liver resections].[肝门部Glisson鞘入路在解剖性肝段切除术中处理血管-分泌结构]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2008(9):33-40.
2
Intrahepatic Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right segmental liver resections.腹腔镜右半肝切除术的肝内Glisson系统入路
Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):e38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.027. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
3
Localized hepatic ischemia after liver resection: a prospective evaluation.肝切除术后局部肝缺血:一项前瞻性评估。
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):958-64; discussion 964-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c2a58.
4
A standardized technique for right segmental liver resections.
Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):918-20. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.918.
5
Effect of type of resection on outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.切除类型对结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后结局的影响。
Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1242-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5640.
6
The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections.中心静脉压的作用及血管控制类型对大肝切除术中失血的影响
Am J Surg. 2004 Mar;187(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.001.
7
Selective hepatic vascular exclusion versus pringle maneuver in partial hepatectomy for liver hemangioma compressing or involving the major hepatic veins.肝血管瘤压迫或累及主要肝静脉的肝部分切除术中选择性肝血管阻断与第一肝门阻断的比较
Am Surg. 2014 Mar;80(3):236-40.
8
Results of laparoscopic liver resection: retrospective study of 68 patients.腹腔镜肝切除术的结果:68例患者的回顾性研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(1):64-8. doi: 10.1007/s00534-008-0009-y. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
9
Selective hepatic vascular exclusion and Pringle maneuver: a comparative study in liver resection.选择性肝血管阻断与普林格尔手法:肝切除术中的一项对比研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;34(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
10
Intrahepatic Glissonian access for segmental liver resection in cirrhotic patients.肝硬化患者肝段切除术中肝内Glisson系统入路
Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):388-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.017.