Sivagangabalan Gopal, Eshoo Suzanne, Eipper Vicki E, Thiagalingam Aravinda, Kovoor Pramesh
Cardiology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Sep;31(9):1095-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01147.x.
We assessed the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and low-energy (5J) shock for very fast ventricular tachycardia (VFVT), cycle length 200-250 ms, in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).
One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients with standard indications for ICD therapy were enrolled. Before discharge from the hospital each patient had an electrophysiological study (EPS) performed through the device, to assess the efficacy of ATP and low-joule shock at terminating VFVT. Initial therapy for VFVT consisted of three bursts of ATP followed by low-energy shock, and high-energy shocks as required. The mean age of enrolled patients was 63 +/- 13 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31 +/- 13%. During the predischarge EPS, a total of 125 VT episodes were induced in 64 patients. In patients with VFVT, the success rate of ATP was 30% (14/46), the acceleration rate was 26% (12/46), and the success rate of low-energy shock was 86% (25/29). In patients with fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT), cycle lengths 251-320 ms, the success rate of ATP was 62% (24/39), the acceleration rate was 18% (7/39), and the success rate of low-energy shock was 94% (17/18).
This study has demonstrated for the first time that ATP and low-energy shock are effective, as an alternative to high-energy shock, to revert induced VFVT. Low-energy shock has a very high success rate for VT slower than VFVT. Clinical studies are required prior to consideration for empiric programming.
我们评估了抗心动过速起搏(ATP)和低能量(5J)电击对植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者中周期长度为200 - 250毫秒的极快速室性心动过速(VFVT)的疗效。
连续纳入152例有ICD治疗标准适应证的患者。在出院前,通过该装置对每位患者进行电生理研究(EPS),以评估ATP和低能量电击终止VFVT的疗效。VFVT的初始治疗包括3次ATP猝发,随后是低能量电击,并根据需要进行高能量电击。纳入患者的平均年龄为63±13岁,平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为31±13%。在出院前的EPS期间,64例患者共诱发了125次室性心动过速发作。在VFVT患者中,ATP的成功率为30%(14/46),加速率为26%(12/46),低能量电击的成功率为86%(25/29)。在周期长度为251 - 320毫秒的快速室性心动过速(FVT)患者中,ATP的成功率为62%(24/39),加速率为18%(7/39),低能量电击的成功率为94%(17/18)。
本研究首次证明,作为高能量电击的替代方法,ATP和低能量电击对诱发的VFVT复律有效。低能量电击对比VFVT慢的室性心动过速成功率非常高。在考虑经验性编程之前需要进行临床研究。