Manente Sabrina, De Pieri Silvia, Iero Alessandra, Rigo Chiarafrancesca, Bragadin Marcantonio
Department of Environmental Sciences, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Dorsoduro, Venice 30123, Italy.
Anal Biochem. 2008 Dec 15;383(2):316-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
The acridine orange (AO) and neutral red (NR) dyes, commonly used as probes to measure the internal pH in acidic vesicles, are compared in this article. The comparison between the two dyes (arising from calculations taking into account their analytical constants) illustrated that the use of AO is preferential to that of NR because the AO response is sensitive over the whole pH range between 4.0 and 7.4, whereas the NR response is effective only between pHs 4.0 and 6.0. In addition, it became evident from the mitochondrial respiration response that NR, unlike AO, is a protonophore. When taken into consideration, these two properties suggest that AO is more suitable than NR as an indicator of toxicity measurements in water samples because the environmental toxic compounds induce pH changes in the acidic vesicles of biological structures that are used as environmental biosensors.
本文对常用于测量酸性囊泡内部pH值的吖啶橙(AO)和中性红(NR)染料进行了比较。两种染料之间的比较(通过考虑其分析常数的计算得出)表明,AO的使用优于NR,因为AO在4.0至7.4的整个pH范围内响应灵敏,而NR仅在pH值4.0至6.0之间有效。此外,从线粒体呼吸反应中可以明显看出,与AO不同,NR是一种质子载体。综合考虑,这两个特性表明,AO比NR更适合作为水样毒性测量的指标,因为环境有毒化合物会导致用作环境生物传感器的生物结构酸性囊泡中的pH值发生变化。