• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性1572名研究者的概况。

The profile of the one-time 1572 investigator.

作者信息

Glass Harold E

机构信息

University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2008.09.008
PMID:18835461
Abstract

The FDA database on investigators completing the 1572 form constitutes a rich database of practicing investigators. Within the most recent three-year period, roughly half of all the principal investigators appear only once in the 1572 database, which leads some to conclude that many of these investigators have only conducted one study and may be reluctant to be involved in a second clinical trial. Part of the misunderstanding about these investigators comes from the incorrect notion that 1572 forms are required to be submitted to the FDA. Drawing upon a random sample of 762 US investigators, the study concludes that many of the one-time 1572 investigators have participated as principal investigators in far more than one clinical trial, although the number is less than the number of clinical trials reported by investigators with multiple 1572s on record. There are few demographic or prescribing differences between the one-time 1572 and the multi-1572 groups. Nor do they differ in the reasons for taking part in clinical trials. Investigators with multiple 1572s are more likely though to come from academic medical centers, teaching organizations or research centers. Investigators with one 1572 are no more dissatisfied with the key activities of running clinical trials at their sites than are other investigators, although the one 1572 investigators appear slightly less willing to continuing their participation in clinical trials. Investigators with multiple 1572s, with their record of IND trial experience are a valuable pool of candidates for clinical trials. However, the data in this study cautions organizations conducting clinical trials to not overlook the single largest group of investigators, those in the one-time 1572 pool.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于填写1572表格的研究者的数据库构成了一个丰富的执业研究者数据库。在最近三年期间,所有主要研究者中约有一半仅在1572数据库中出现过一次,这使得一些人得出结论,这些研究者中的许多人只进行过一项研究,可能不愿参与第二项临床试验。对这些研究者的部分误解源于一种错误观念,即认为需要向FDA提交1572表格。该研究抽取了762名美国研究者作为随机样本,得出结论:许多仅填写过一次1572表格的研究者作为主要研究者参与的临床试验远不止一项,尽管其数量少于有多项1572记录的研究者所报告的临床试验数量。仅填写过一次1572表格的研究者与填写过多次1572表格的研究者在人口统计学特征或处方方面几乎没有差异。他们参与临床试验的原因也没有不同。不过,有多项1572记录的研究者更有可能来自学术医疗中心、教学机构或研究中心。仅填写过一次1572表格的研究者对在其机构开展临床试验的关键活动的不满程度并不高于其他研究者,尽管仅填写过一次1572表格的研究者似乎稍不太愿意继续参与临床试验。有多项1572记录且有研究性新药(IND)试验经验记录的研究者是临床试验的宝贵候选人群体。然而,本研究中的数据提醒开展临床试验的机构不要忽视最大的单一研究者群体,即仅填写过一次1572表格的那些人。

相似文献

1
The profile of the one-time 1572 investigator.一次性1572名研究者的概况。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan;30(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
2
Racial disparities among clinical research investigators.临床研究调查人员中的种族差异。
Am J Ther. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):3-11. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31815fa75a.
3
[Hazard, risk and harm in clinical trials].[临床试验中的危害、风险与损害]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 Aug;25(146):105-9.
4
The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting.临床医生作为研究者:在实际临床环境中参与临床试验。
Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):2672-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128702.16441.75.
5
[Organisation of clinical research in France: the new missions of inter-regional delegations for clinical research].[法国临床研究的组织架构:临床研究跨地区代表团的新使命]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008 May;192(5):929-37; discussion 937-9.
6
Practical considerations in planning and conducting clinical trials with investigational or marketed drugs.使用研究性药物或已上市药物进行临床试验的规划与实施中的实际考量。
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1983;6(4):325-47.
7
A cooperative network of trained sites for the conduct of a complex clinical trial: a new concept in multicenter clinical research.一个用于开展复杂临床试验的经过培训的站点合作网络:多中心临床研究中的新概念。
Am Heart J. 2006 Feb;151(2):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.013.
8
Invisible barriers to clinical trials: the impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials.肿瘤临床试验的无形障碍:开展肿瘤临床试验时结构、基础设施及程序方面的障碍所产生的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4545-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0104.
9
[How to prevent hazards and to reduce risk in clinical trials?].如何在临床试验中预防危害并降低风险?
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 Dec;25(150):534-8.
10
Clinical trials profile: professionals and sites.临床试验概况:专业人员和机构。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):438-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in clinical trial investigator workforce and turnover: An analysis of the U.S. FDA 1572 BMIS database.临床试验研究者队伍及人员流动趋势:对美国食品药品监督管理局1572号生物医学研究监测信息系统数据库的分析
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 21;15:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100380. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
One and done: Reasons principal investigators conduct only one FDA-regulated drug trial.一劳永逸:主要研究者仅开展一项受美国食品药品监督管理局监管的药物试验的原因。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Mar 8;6:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.009. eCollection 2017 Jun.