Suppr超能文献

新西兰目标人群中用于检测抗口蹄疫病毒血清抗体的非结构蛋白酶联免疫吸附测定的特异性

Specificity of non-structural protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of serum antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus in a target population in New Zealand.

作者信息

Kittelberger R, Mackereth G F, Sewell M, Keall J, Clough R, Pigott C, O'Keefe J S

机构信息

Investigation and Diagnostic Centre Wallaceville, Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Upper Hutt, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Vet J. 2008 Oct;56(5):227-32. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2008.36838.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the diagnostic specificities of two commercial screening ELISA, the Bommeli/IDEXX Chekit FMD 3ABC indirect ELISA (ELISA-1) and the Ceditest FMDV NS blocking ELISA (ELISA-2), for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in cattle, sheep and pigs in New Zealand, and to compare them with other published studies. To consider the implications for FMD surveillance of using two ELISA in series, a consideration arising from the absence of a gold standard virus neutralisation test (VNT) in New Zealand.

METHODS

Serum samples from non-infected cattle (n=1,015), sheep (n=1,185), and pigs (n=233) from New Zealand were tested in ELISA-1 and ELISA-2 for the detection of serum antibodies against non-structural proteins of the FMD virus. The ELISA were performed according to the manufacturers' instructions.

RESULTS

The diagnostic specificities for ELISA-1 for cattle, sheep and pigs were 99.9%, 99.7% and 99.6%, respectively, and for ELISA-2 were 99.5%, 99.7% and 99.6%, respectively. False-positive reactors in one ELISA were negative in the other ELISA, and vice versa. Using the diagnostic sensitivity data taken from international studies and the diagnostic specificities calculated in this study resulted in overall specificities of 100% in cattle and sheep using serial test interpretation, and 99.2% and 99.0%, respectively, using parallel test interpretation. Diagnostic sensitivities available in the literature varied considerably, and the associated overall serial sensitivity could be as low as 78.7% in cattle and 33.2% in sheep.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic specificities for both ELISA for the target population were comparable with those obtained in livestock populations elsewhere. In surveillance to re-establish New Zealand's freedom from FMD, the use of two ELISA in series would improve the overall specificity in individual animals. However, care would be required to ensure that herd sensitivity was sufficient to detect infection.

摘要

目的

确定两种商用筛查酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),即博梅利/爱德士Chekit FMD 3ABC间接ELISA(ELISA - 1)和Ceditest FMDV NS阻断ELISA(ELISA - 2)对新西兰牛、羊和猪口蹄疫(FMD)的诊断特异性,并将其与其他已发表的研究进行比较。鉴于新西兰缺乏金标准病毒中和试验(VNT),考虑串联使用两种ELISA对口蹄疫监测的影响。

方法

对来自新西兰的未感染牛(n = 1015)、羊(n = 1185)和猪(n = 233)的血清样本进行ELISA - 1和ELISA - 2检测,以检测针对口蹄疫病毒非结构蛋白的血清抗体。ELISA检测按照制造商的说明进行。

结果

ELISA - 1对牛、羊和猪的诊断特异性分别为99.9%、99.7%和99.6%,ELISA - 2的诊断特异性分别为99.5%、99.7%和99.6%。一种ELISA中的假阳性反应者在另一种ELISA中为阴性,反之亦然。利用国际研究中的诊断敏感性数据和本研究计算出的诊断特异性,采用串联试验解释时,牛和羊的总体特异性为100%,采用平行试验解释时,总体特异性分别为99.2%和99.0%。文献中的诊断敏感性差异很大,相关的总体串联敏感性在牛中可能低至78.7%,在羊中为33.2%。

结论

两种ELISA对目标群体的诊断特异性与其他地方家畜群体的诊断特异性相当。在重新确立新西兰无口蹄疫的监测中,串联使用两种ELISA将提高个体动物的总体特异性。然而,需要注意确保畜群敏感性足以检测到感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验