Retting Richard A, Farmer Charles M, McCartt Anne T
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia 22201, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;9(5):440-5. doi: 10.1080/15389580802221333.
Almost one quarter of speeding-related fatalities occur on streets with speed limits of 35 mph or less. In 2007, Montgomery County, Maryland, implemented the state's first automated speed enforcement program, with camera use limited to residential streets with speeds limits of 35 mph or less and school zones. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate initial effects of camera enforcement on traffic speeds and to assess public attitudes.
Vehicle speeds were measured approximately 6 months before and 6 months after speed cameras were deployed and warning signs were installed. Speed data were collected on a sample of roads with and without camera enforcement in Montgomery County, as well as on a sample of roads in a comparison community that did not have speed cameras. In addition, telephone surveys were conducted in Montgomery County.
Relative to speeds of drivers on roads in the comparison community, the proportion of drivers in Montgomery County traveling more than 10 mph above posted speed limits declined by about 70% at locations with both warning signs and speed camera enforcement, 39% at locations with warning signs but no speed cameras, and 16% on residential streets with neither warning signs nor speed cameras. Public opinion surveys found 74% of Montgomery County drivers thought speeding on residential streets was a problem. Six months after enforcement began, 60% of drivers were aware of the camera program and 62% supported it.
The camera program was effective at reducing speeding on targeted streets. The finding of speed reductions beyond targeted locations is evidence that highly visible automated enforcement can promote community-wide changes in driver behavior. Although a majority of drivers supported automated speed enforcement, about one third opposed it. Jurisdictions planning to implement speed cameras should draw on international experience to anticipate controversies that generally arise and take steps to address them.
近四分之一与超速相关的死亡事故发生在限速35英里每小时及以下的街道上。2007年,马里兰州蒙哥马利县实施了该州首个自动测速执法项目,摄像头仅用于限速35英里每小时及以下的住宅街道和学校区域。本研究的目的是评估摄像头执法对交通速度的初步影响,并评估公众态度。
在部署测速摄像头和安装警示标志前约6个月以及之后约6个月测量车辆速度。在蒙哥马利县有和没有摄像头执法的道路样本上收集速度数据,以及在没有测速摄像头的对照社区的道路样本上收集速度数据。此外,在蒙哥马利县进行了电话调查。
与对照社区道路上的驾驶员速度相比,在既有警示标志又有摄像头执法的地点,蒙哥马利县超过限速10英里每小时以上行驶的驾驶员比例下降了约70%,在有警示标志但没有摄像头的地点下降了39%,在既没有警示标志也没有摄像头的住宅街道上下降了16%。民意调查发现,74%的蒙哥马利县驾驶员认为在住宅街道上超速是个问题。执法开始6个月后,60%的驾驶员知道了摄像头项目,62%的驾驶员支持该项目。
摄像头项目在减少目标街道上的超速方面是有效的。在目标地点以外的地方也出现速度降低的情况,这一发现证明了高度可见的自动执法可以促进整个社区驾驶员行为的改变。虽然大多数驾驶员支持自动测速执法,但约三分之一的驾驶员反对。计划实施测速摄像头的司法管辖区应借鉴国际经验,预测通常会出现的争议并采取措施加以解决。