Monnier Patrick
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 700 W Lake Street, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA.
Vision Res. 2008 Dec;48(27):2708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
Inducing patterns that selectively stimulate the S cones can induce large shifts in color appearance. For example, a "peach" test-ring presented within contiguous purple and non-contiguous lime inducing rings appears pink while the physically identical peach test-ring appears orange when presented within contiguous lime and non-contiguous purple inducing rings (Fig. 1c). These shifts have been accounted for by a neural substrate which predicts that chromatic assimilation and simultaneous contrast can operate synergistically to produce large shifts with these patterns [Monnier, P., & Shevell, S. K. (2004). Chromatic induction from S-cone patterns. Vision Research, 44, 849-856]. Here, induction was measured for test-rings that stimulated the S cones either more or less than did the inducing rings. According to standard definitions of induction, color shifts for test s-chromaticities either lower or higher than both inducing chromaticities should be attenuated compared to test-rings of intermediate S-cone stimulation. On the other hand, a previously proposed model of induction predicted independence of the color shifts with test-ring s-chromaticity. Consistent with standard definitions of induction, a reduction in the magnitude of the color shifts for test-ring chromaticities either lower or higher in S-cone excitation than the inducing chromaticities was observed. Additional measurements with patterns that have been shown to isolate assimilation and simultaneous contrast were conducted. For these patterns, expectations based on standard definitions of induction suggested that the magnitude of the color shifts should be monotonic with the S-cone stimulation of the test-ring, and the direction of the color shift should reverse for test-ring chromaticities either lower or higher than both inducing chromaticities compared to test-rings of intermediate chromaticity. In contrast, the previously proposed model of induction based on a receptive-field with S-cone spatial antagonism predicted the color shifts should be independent of the test-ring chromaticity (Monnier & Shevell, 2004). Color shifts were generally independent of the level of the test-ring chromaticity, supporting the S-cone antagonistic model of induction.
诱导出选择性刺激S视锥细胞的模式能够引起颜色外观的大幅变化。例如,呈现于相邻紫色和不相邻柠檬绿诱导环内的“桃色”测试环看起来是粉色的,而当呈现于相邻柠檬绿和不相邻紫色诱导环内时,物理上相同的桃色测试环看起来却是橙色的(图1c)。这些变化已由一种神经基质作出了解释,该基质预测,色同化和同时对比能够协同作用,以这些模式产生大幅变化[莫尼耶,P.,& 谢韦尔,S. K.(2004年)。来自S视锥细胞模式的色诱导。《视觉研究》,44,849 - 856]。在此,对刺激S视锥细胞程度或多或少高于诱导环的测试环进行了诱导测量。根据诱导的标准定义,与中等S视锥细胞刺激的测试环相比,测试色度低于或高于两种诱导色度时的颜色变化应该会减弱。另一方面,先前提出的一种诱导模型预测颜色变化与测试环的色度无关。与诱导的标准定义一致,观察到测试环色度在S视锥细胞激发方面低于或高于诱导色度时,颜色变化幅度减小。还对已被证明可分离同化和同时对比的模式进行了额外测量。对于这些模式,基于诱导标准定义的预期表明,颜色变化幅度应与测试环的S视锥细胞刺激呈单调关系,并且与中等色度的测试环相比,测试环色度低于或高于两种诱导色度时,颜色变化方向应该会反转。相比之下,先前基于具有S视锥细胞空间拮抗作用的感受野提出的诱导模型预测颜色变化应与测试环色度无关(莫尼耶和谢韦尔,2004年)。颜色变化通常与测试环色度水平无关,这支持了S视锥细胞拮抗诱导模型。