Zele Andrew J, Smith Vivianne C, Pokorny Joel
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):495-501. doi: 10.1017/S0952523806233418.
Discrimination for equiluminant chromatic stimuli that vary in L- and M-cone excitation depends on the chromaticity difference between the test field and the surrounding area. The current study investigated the effect of the proximity in space and time of a surround to the test field on chromatic contrast discrimination. The experimental paradigm isolated spatial, temporal, and spatial-and-temporal chromatic contrast effects on discrimination. Chromatic contrast discrimination thresholds were assessed by a four-alternative spatial forced-choice procedure. Stimuli were either metameric to the equal energy spectrum, or varied in L-cone activation along a line of constant S-cone activation. A model based on primate parvocellular pathway physiology described the data. Spatial and temporal contrast produced equivalent reductions in chromatic discriminability as the chromatic difference between the test and surround increased. For all test chromaticities, discrimination was best in the absence of chromatic contrast. Chromatic contrast discrimination is determined by either the spatial or temporal contrast component of the signal.
对于在L-和M-视锥细胞兴奋度上有所变化的等亮度色刺激的辨别,取决于测试区域与周围区域之间的色度差异。当前的研究调查了周围区域在空间和时间上与测试区域的接近程度对色对比度辨别的影响。实验范式分离出了空间、时间以及空间和时间色对比度对辨别产生的影响。色对比度辨别阈值通过四选一空间强制选择程序进行评估。刺激要么与等能光谱匹配,要么在沿着恒定S-视锥细胞激活线的L-视锥细胞激活方面有所变化。一个基于灵长类动物小细胞通路生理学的模型对数据进行了描述。随着测试区域与周围区域之间的色度差异增加,空间和时间对比度在色辨别能力上产生了同等程度的降低。对于所有测试色度,在没有色对比度的情况下辨别效果最佳。色对比度辨别由信号的空间或时间对比度成分决定。