Suppr超能文献

安非他酮戒烟的严重不良反应:对2001年至2004年法国药物警戒数据库的分析

Serious adverse reactions of bupropion for smoking cessation: analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database from 2001 to 2004.

作者信息

Beyens Marie-Nöelle, Guy Claire, Mounier Genevieve, Laporte Sylvie, Ollagnier Michel

机构信息

Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, Bellevue Hospital University, Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2008;31(11):1017-26. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831110-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bupropion was the first alternative to nicotine replacement therapy in the pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation. Its safety profile has been monitored in France via spontaneous reporting.

OBJECTIVE

To describe all serious adverse reactions (SARs) reported in France since the marketing authorization for bupropion in September 2001, and to analyse risk factors for these SARs.

DESIGN

We collected all spontaneous reports of adverse reactions to bupropion received by all French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres and by GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of bupropion, during the first 3 years of marketing of this agent. We identified the characteristics of the population to whom bupropion was prescribed from the Thales database, which contains information obtained from a representative sample of general practitioners in France. We then compared the population with SARs with the population prescribed the drug (exposed population) to identify possible risk factors such as sex, age and daily dose for the most frequent SARs.

RESULTS

Bupropion was prescribed to 698 000 patients during the first 3 years of marketing in France. In these patients, 1682 cases of adverse reactions were reported; 28% of these involved SARs, mainly cutaneous or allergic reactions (31.2%), including angioedema and serum sickness-like reactions. Serious neurological reactions were frequent (22.5%), mostly comprising seizures; however, questioning revealed that almost half of these patients had a history of seizures or other risk factors. Of the serious neuropsychiatric adverse events reported (17.3%), suicide attempts/suicides were a cause for concern, although risk factors (history of depression, suicide attempts, etc.) were described for 66% of patients experiencing these events. Patients reporting angioedema and serum sickness-like reactions, and those involved in suicide attempts/suicides, were significantly younger than the exposed population. A dose-dependent effect was also apparent for angioedema and for seizures. Cardiovascular SARs, such as ischaemic heart disease (10.1%) or sudden death (2.3%), were very often associated with pre-existing coronary artery disease induced by smoking. All these SARs occurred within a median of 12-14 days after drug initiation.

CONCLUSION

To ensure safer use of bupropion, health professionals must respect the strict contraindications and warnings about use of this drug in patients with a history of seizures. Seizures, angioedema and serum sickness-like reactions were the most frequently reported SARs to bupropion treatment in our study. Moreover, younger people appeared to be more at risk for cutaneous SARs generally, and younger women for angioedema in particular, perhaps because of weight-related differences in pharmacokinetics. A dose-dependent effect for angioedema and the results of skin tests were suggestive of a histamine liberation mechanism. Our analysis showed that taking more notice of the contraindications to use of bupropion could have prevented half the seizures reported to the database. The sex and age characteristics of patients with ischaemic heart disease and suicide attempts in the study population were similar to those of the French population as a whole. Whether bupropion is associated with an increase in these potential adverse effects of therapy can be determined only by epidemiological studies that take into account specific risk factors in the smoking population. Finally, the median time to onset of the SARs identified in this study suggests that prescribers should monitor patients exposed to bupropion more carefully during the first 2 weeks of treatment.

摘要

背景

安非他酮是戒烟药物治疗中尼古丁替代疗法的首个替代药物。其安全性在法国通过自发报告进行监测。

目的

描述自2001年9月安非他酮获得上市许可以来在法国报告的所有严重不良反应(SARs),并分析这些SARs的风险因素。

设计

我们收集了法国所有地区药物警戒中心以及安非他酮制造商葛兰素史克在该药物上市的前3年收到的所有安非他酮不良反应自发报告。我们从泰利斯数据库中确定了开具安非他酮处方的人群特征,该数据库包含从法国全科医生的代表性样本中获得的信息。然后我们将出现SARs的人群与开具该药物的人群(暴露人群)进行比较,以确定最常见SARs的可能风险因素,如性别、年龄和每日剂量。

结果

在法国上市的前3年中,有698000名患者开具了安非他酮处方。在这些患者中,报告了1682例不良反应;其中28%涉及SARs,主要是皮肤或过敏反应(31.2%),包括血管性水肿和血清病样反应。严重的神经反应很常见(22.5%),主要包括癫痫发作;然而,进一步询问发现,这些患者中几乎一半有癫痫发作史或其他风险因素。在报告的严重神经精神不良事件中(17.3%),自杀未遂/自杀令人担忧,尽管66%经历这些事件的患者描述了风险因素(抑郁症病史、自杀未遂等)。报告血管性水肿和血清病样反应的患者以及自杀未遂/自杀的患者明显比暴露人群年轻。血管性水肿和癫痫发作也存在剂量依赖性效应。心血管SARs,如缺血性心脏病(10.1%)或猝死(2.3%),常常与吸烟引起的既往冠状动脉疾病有关。所有这些SARs均在开始用药后的中位时间12 - 14天内出现。

结论

为确保更安全地使用安非他酮,卫生专业人员必须严格遵守关于有癫痫发作史患者使用该药物的禁忌和警告。在我们的研究中,癫痫发作、血管性水肿和血清病样反应是安非他酮治疗中最常报告的SARs。此外,一般来说年轻人似乎更容易出现皮肤SARs,特别是年轻女性更容易出现血管性水肿,这可能是由于药代动力学中与体重相关的差异。血管性水肿的剂量依赖性效应和皮肤试验结果提示存在组胺释放机制。我们的分析表明,更多地关注安非他酮使用的禁忌可以预防数据库中报告的一半癫痫发作。研究人群中缺血性心脏病和自杀未遂患者的性别和年龄特征与法国总体人群相似。安非他酮是否与治疗的这些潜在不良反应增加有关,只能通过考虑吸烟人群中特定风险因素的流行病学研究来确定。最后,本研究中确定的SARs的中位发病时间表明,开处方者应在治疗的前2周更仔细地监测使用安非他酮的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验