Smith Toby O, Hunt Nathan J, Donell Simon T
Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Dec;16(12):1068-79. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0643-6. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
The quadriceps or Q-angle is an index of the vector for the combined pull of the extensor mechanisms and the patellar tendon. It is used as an indicator for patellofemoral joint dysfunction. The purpose of this article is to systematically review and appraise the literature to determine the reliability and validity of this test. An electronic database search was performed accessing AMED, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, ovid Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PsycINFO, Pubmed and Zetoc to April 2008. All English language, human subject, clinical trials, assessing the inter- or intra-tester reliability, or the criterion validity, were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme appraisal tool was used to establish the methodological quality of each study. Ten articles including 569 control and 179 patellofemoral disorder knees were reviewed. The findings suggest that there is considerable disagreement on the reliability and validity of the clinical Q-angle measurement. This may be due to a lack of standardisation in the measurement procedure. Further study is advocated to re-evaluate this topic using well-designed, and sufficiently large observational studies of specific patellofemoral dysfunction populations.
股四头肌或Q角是伸肌机制和髌腱联合拉力矢量的一个指标。它被用作髌股关节功能障碍的一个指标。本文的目的是系统地回顾和评估文献,以确定该测试的可靠性和有效性。进行了电子数据库检索,检索了截至2008年4月的AMED、英国护理索引、CINAHL、Cochrane数据库、EMBASE、ovid Medline、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、PsycINFO、Pubmed和Zetoc。纳入了所有英文、以人为研究对象、评估测试者间或测试者内可靠性或标准效度的临床试验。使用批判性评估技能计划评估工具来确定每项研究的方法学质量。回顾了10篇文章,包括569个对照膝关节和179个髌股关节疾病膝关节。研究结果表明,临床Q角测量的可靠性和有效性存在相当大的分歧。这可能是由于测量程序缺乏标准化。提倡进一步研究,使用针对特定髌股关节功能障碍人群精心设计且样本量足够大的观察性研究来重新评估这个主题。