Van der Burg Erik, Olivers Christian N L, Bronkhorst Adelbert W, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Vis. 2008 May 7;8(5):2.1-10. doi: 10.1167/8.5.2.
Is an irrelevant audiovisual event able to guide attention automatically? In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked to make a temporal order judgment (TOJ) about which of two dots (left or right) appeared first. In Experiment 3, participants were asked to make a simultaneity judgment (SJ) instead. Such tasks have been shown to be affected by attention. Lateral to each of the dots, nine irrelevant distractors continuously changed color. Prior to the presentation of the first dot, a spatially non-informative tone was synchronized with the color change of one of these distractors, either on the same side or on the opposite side of the first dot. Even though both the tone and the distractors were completely irrelevant to the task, TOJs were affected by the synchronized distractor. TOJs were not affected when the tone was absent or synchronized with distractors on both sides. SJs were also affected by the synchronized distractor, ruling out an alternative response bias hypothesis. We conclude that audiovisual synchrony guides attention in an exogenous manner.
一个不相关的视听事件能够自动引导注意力吗?在实验1和实验2中,参与者被要求对两个点(左或右)中哪个先出现进行时间顺序判断(TOJ)。在实验3中,参与者被要求进行同时性判断(SJ)。此类任务已被证明会受到注意力的影响。在每个点的旁边,九个不相关的干扰物不断改变颜色。在第一个点出现之前,一个空间上无信息的音调与其中一个干扰物的颜色变化同步,要么在第一个点的同一侧,要么在其相反侧。尽管音调和干扰物都与任务完全无关,但时间顺序判断受到了同步干扰物的影响。当没有音调或音调与两侧的干扰物同步时,时间顺序判断不受影响。同时性判断也受到同步干扰物的影响,排除了另一种反应偏差假设。我们得出结论,视听同步以外源性方式引导注意力。