Cournoyer J, Monette Y
Hôpital Louis-H. Lafontaine, Montréal, Québec.
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;36(5):339-43. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600504.
Psychiatrists in particular face a clinical, legal and social dilemma in treating their patients who are likely to categorically oppose treatment. This article illustrates this dilemma in the context of Quebec's Bill 145, resulting in the care of psychiatric patients being increasingly referred to the courts. After presenting this legislation and a case, the authors illustrate the impact of this legislation in light of their own experience and similar legislation in the United States. The mechanisms proposed by Bill 145 have proved costly in several respects as well as cumbersome and ineffective. The authors propose the establishment of an administrative tribunal as an alternative to the current recourse to the courts.
特别是精神科医生在治疗那些可能坚决反对治疗的患者时,面临着临床、法律和社会方面的困境。本文在魁北克第145号法案的背景下阐述了这一困境,导致精神病患者的护理越来越多地被提交给法院。在介绍这项立法和一个案例后,作者根据自己的经验以及美国的类似立法来说明这项立法的影响。第145号法案提出的机制在几个方面已被证明成本高昂、繁琐且无效。作者提议设立一个行政法庭,作为目前诉诸法院的替代方案。