Yoon Dae Young, Hwang Hee Sung, Chang Suk Ki, Rho Young-Soo, Ahn Hwoe Young, Kim Jin Hwan, Lee In Jae
Department of Radiology, Kangdong Seong-Sim Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangdong-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):634-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1192-6. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of four different imaging methods-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography (US), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT-and their combined use for preoperative detection of cervical nodal metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Sixty-seven patients (58 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.1 years) with head and neck SCCs underwent CT, MR, US, and PET/CT before surgery. First, each study was reviewed separately for the presence of nodal metastases. Then, the value of combined images was assessed based on a confidence rating score for each modality assigned by observers. These results were verified, on a level-by-level basis, with histopathologic findings. Histopathologic examination revealed nodal metastases in 74 of 402 nodal levels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 77.0%, 99.4%, and 95.3% for CT and MR; 78.4%, 98.5%, and 94.8% for US; and 81.1%, 98.2%, and 95.0% for PET/CT, respectively. The comparison of these modalities showed no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). The combination of CT, MR, US, and PET/CT improved sensitivity (86.5%), without loss of specificity (99.4%) and accuracy (97.0%), although the difference failed to reach statistical significance.
本回顾性研究的目的是比较四种不同成像方法——计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振(MR)成像、超声检查(US)和(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/CT——及其联合使用对头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)颈淋巴结转移术前检测的诊断价值。67例头颈部SCC患者(58例男性,9例女性;平均年龄60.1岁)在手术前行CT、MR、US和PET/CT检查。首先,分别对每项检查进行回顾,以确定是否存在淋巴结转移。然后,根据观察者为每种检查方式指定的置信度评分来评估联合图像的价值。这些结果在各个层面上与组织病理学结果进行了验证。组织病理学检查显示,402个淋巴结层面中有74个存在淋巴结转移。CT和MR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为77.0%、99.4%和95.3%;US为78.4%、98.5%和94.8%;PET/CT为81.1%、98.2%和95.0%。这些检查方式之间的比较显示,它们之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。CT、MR、US和PET/CT联合使用提高了敏感性(86.5%),同时不失特异性(99.4%)和准确性(97.0%),尽管差异未达到统计学显著性。