Sloan Derek, Dlamini Sipho, Paul Navin, Dedicoat Martin
Hlabisa hospital, Private Bag x5001, Hlabisa, KwaZulu / Natal, South Africa, 3937.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD005647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005647.pub2.
Despite the advent and increasingly wide availability of antiretroviral therapy, cryptococcal meningitis (CM) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity amongst individuals with HIV infection in resource-limited settings. The ideal management of CM remains unclear. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence for deciding on which antifungal regimen to use as well as other modalities of management to utilise especially resource poor settings in order to achieve the best possible outcome and enable an individual with CM to survive their acute illness and benefit from antiretroviral therapy.
To determine the most effective initial and consolidation treatment strategy for CM in HIV infected adults.
The Cochrane HIV/AIDS group search strategy was used. Key words in the search included, meningitis, cryptococcus neoformans, treatment, trial, human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, antifungal agents, amphotericin, flucytosine, fluconazole, azole, lumbar puncture, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and acetazolamide.
Randomised of HIV-infected adults with a first episode of CM diagnosed on CSF examination, by India ink staining, CSF culture or cryptococcal antigen testing.
Data were extracted using standardised forms and analysed using Rev Man 4.2.7 software.
Six studies are included in the review. Five of the studies compared antifungal treatments and one study addressed lowering intracranial pressure. This study was stopped early due to excess adverse effects. The results of the other five studies as summarised as follows.Mayanja-Kizza 1998 compared fluconazole to fluconazole with 5 flucytosine. The dose of fluconazole used 200mg initially is lower than the recommended initial dose of 400mg. No survival advantage was found with the use of 5 flucytosine in addition to fluconazole.Two studies Brouwer 2004 and van der Horst 1997 compared Amphotericin (AmB) to AmB with 5 flucytosine. Both drugs were given at currently recommended doses for 2 weeks. No survival difference was found at 14 days or at 10 weeks (only recorded in Brouwer 2004). There were significantly more patients with sterile CSF cultures at 14 days in the group that received AmB with flucytosine.Brouwer 2004 compared AmB given alone to AmB given with flucytosine and fluconazole alone or in combination. This was a small study and no differences in mortality were noted between the groups.Bicanic 2008 compared high to standard dose AmB both with flucytosine. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups or adverse events.Leenders 1997 compared standard AmB to liposomal AmB. There was no difference in death rates between the two groups. But there were significantly fewer side effects in the group treated with liposomal AmB.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The main aim of this review was to determine the best treatment for cryptococcal meningitis in resource-limited settings. In these settings usually only AmB and fluconazole are available. No studies suitable for inclusion in the review were found that compared these two drugs. Therefore we are unable to recommend either treatment as superior to the other. The recommended treatment for CM is a combination of AmB and flucytosine. The optimal dosing of AmB remains unclear. Liposomal AmB is associated with less adverse events than AmB and may be useful in selected patients where resources allow.Future research into the management of cryptococcal meningitis in resource-limited settings should focus on the most effective use of medications that are available in these settings.Flucytosine in combination with AmB leads to faster and increased sterilisation of CSF compared to using AmB alone. As Flucytosine is often not available in developing countries, policy makers and national departments of heath should consider procuring this drug for HIV treatment programmes.
尽管抗逆转录病毒疗法已经出现且越来越容易获得,但在资源有限的环境中,隐球菌性脑膜炎(CM)仍然是艾滋病毒感染者死亡和发病的重要原因。CM的理想治疗方法仍不明确。本综述的目的是评估证据,以决定使用哪种抗真菌方案以及采用其他管理方式,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,以实现最佳结果,使CM患者能够在急性疾病中存活并从抗逆转录病毒疗法中获益。
确定艾滋病毒感染成人CM最有效的初始和巩固治疗策略。
采用Cochrane艾滋病毒/艾滋病小组的检索策略。检索关键词包括脑膜炎、新型隐球菌、治疗、试验、人类免疫缺陷病毒、获得性免疫缺陷综合征、抗真菌剂、两性霉素、氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑、唑类、腰椎穿刺、脑脊液(CSF)压力和乙酰唑胺。
通过脑脊液检查、墨汁染色、脑脊液培养或隐球菌抗原检测确诊为首次发作CM的艾滋病毒感染成人的随机对照试验。
使用标准化表格提取数据,并使用Rev Man 4.2.7软件进行分析。
本综述纳入了6项研究。其中5项研究比较了抗真菌治疗,1项研究探讨了降低颅内压。由于不良反应过多,该研究提前终止。其他5项研究的结果总结如下。
马扬贾-基扎1998年比较了氟康唑与含5氟胞嘧啶的氟康唑。最初使用的氟康唑剂量为200mg,低于推荐的初始剂量400mg。除氟康唑外使用5氟胞嘧啶未发现生存优势。
两项研究(布劳威尔2004年和范德霍斯特1997年)比较了两性霉素(AmB)与含5氟胞嘧啶的AmB。两种药物均按目前推荐剂量给药2周。在14天或10周时未发现生存差异(仅在布劳威尔2004年记录)。接受含氟胞嘧啶AmB治疗的组在14天时脑脊液培养无菌的患者明显更多。
布劳威尔2004年比较了单独使用AmB与联合使用氟胞嘧啶和氟康唑单独或联合使用的AmB。这是一项小型研究,各组之间未发现死亡率差异。
比卡尼克2008年比较了高剂量与标准剂量的均含氟胞嘧啶的AmB。两组之间死亡率或不良事件无差异。
伦德斯1997年比较了标准AmB与脂质体AmB。两组死亡率无差异。但脂质体AmB治疗组的副作用明显更少。
本综述的主要目的是确定资源有限环境中隐球菌性脑膜炎的最佳治疗方法。在这些环境中通常只有AmB和氟康唑可用。未发现适合纳入本综述的比较这两种药物的研究。因此,我们无法推荐哪种治疗优于另一种。CM的推荐治疗方法是AmB和氟胞嘧啶联合使用。AmB的最佳剂量仍不明确。脂质体AmB与AmB相比不良事件较少,在资源允许的特定患者中可能有用。
未来对资源有限环境中隐球菌性脑膜炎管理的研究应侧重于这些环境中可用药物的最有效使用。与单独使用AmB相比,氟胞嘧啶与AmB联合使用可使脑脊液更快且更多地实现无菌。由于发展中国家通常没有氟胞嘧啶,政策制定者和国家卫生部门应考虑为艾滋病毒治疗项目采购这种药物。