Burns Brian, Watkins Laurence, Goadsby Peter J
Headache Group, Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London, UK.
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):1001-12. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70217-5. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
Hemicrania continua (HC) is a primary headache that comprises persistent unilateral pain, is associated with cranial autonomic features, and is responsive to indometacin. Some patients are unable to tolerate this treatment or it is contraindicated; for these patients, the medical options for therapy are restricted. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is an effective treatment for medically intractable primary headache, but only three cases of HC treated with ONS have been reported. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy data for ONS in six patients with HC. ONS was provided by a unilateral neurostimulation device, known as a bion, which might be described as a second-generation ONS device.
Six patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with HC had a suboccipital bion device implanted ipsilateral to their headache and received continuous unilateral ONS. A crossover study design was used: the bion was on for the first 3 months, off for the fourth month, and on again during long-term follow-up. Detailed prospective headache diaries were kept for 1 month before implantation and for 5 months afterwards. Long-term data were obtained from patients' estimates of their outcome. The outcome of this study was assessed by a comparison of headache pain severity before and after ONS.
At a median follow-up of 13.5 months (range 6-21 months), five of six patients reported sufficient benefit to recommend the device to other patients with HC. At long-term follow-up, four of six patients reported a substantial improvement (80-95%), one patient reported a 30% improvement, and one patient reported that his pain was worse by 20%. The onset of the benefit of ONS was delayed by days to weeks, and headaches did not recur for a similar period when the device was switched off. Adverse events were mild and associated with transient overstimulation.
ONS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for HC, particularly when indometacin is not tolerated or is contraindicated. The bion device was well tolerated, easily inserted without significant morbidity, and is one-twentieth of the volume of current devices. Such miniaturised devices are a potential new option for treatment of HC.
持续性偏侧头痛(HC)是一种原发性头痛,表现为持续性单侧疼痛,伴有头部自主神经症状,且对吲哚美辛有反应。一些患者无法耐受这种治疗或存在禁忌;对于这些患者,治疗的医学选择有限。枕神经刺激(ONS)是治疗药物难治性原发性头痛的有效方法,但仅有3例HC患者接受ONS治疗的病例报道。在此,我们报告6例HC患者接受ONS治疗的长期安全性和有效性数据。ONS由一种单侧神经刺激装置(称为生物刺激器)提供,该装置可被视为第二代ONS装置。
6例年龄在18岁及以上、被诊断为HC的患者在头痛同侧植入枕下生物刺激器,并接受持续单侧ONS。采用交叉研究设计:生物刺激器在前3个月开启,第4个月关闭,在长期随访期间再次开启。在植入前1个月和植入后5个月详细记录前瞻性头痛日记。长期数据来自患者对其治疗结果的估计。通过比较ONS前后头痛疼痛严重程度来评估本研究的结果。
在中位随访13.5个月(范围6 - 21个月)时,6例患者中有5例报告有足够益处,建议将该装置推荐给其他HC患者。在长期随访中,6例患者中有4例报告有显著改善(80 - 95%),1例患者报告改善30%,1例患者报告其疼痛加重20%。ONS益处的出现延迟数天至数周,当装置关闭时,头痛在类似时间段内未复发。不良事件轻微,与短暂的过度刺激有关。
ONS似乎是治疗HC的一种安全有效的方法,尤其是在不能耐受或禁忌使用吲哚美辛时。生物刺激器耐受性良好,易于植入且无明显并发症,其体积是当前装置的二十分之一。这种小型化装置是治疗HC的一种潜在新选择。