Stimulus magnification equates identification and discrimination of biological motion across the visual field.

There is conflicting evidence about whether stimulus magnification is sufficient to equate the discriminability of point-light walkers across the visual field. We measured the accuracy with which observers could report the directions of point-light walkers moving +/-4 degrees from the line of sight, and the accuracy with which they could identify five different point-light walkers. In both cases accuracy was measured over a sevenfold range of sizes at eccentricities from 0 degrees to 16 degrees in the right visual field. In most cases observers (N=6) achieved 100% accuracy at the largest stimulus sizes (20 degrees height) at all eccentricities. In both tasks the psychometric functions at each eccentricity were shifted versions of each other on a log-size axis. Therefore, by dividing stimulus size at each eccentricity (E) by an appropriate F=1+E/E(2) (where E(2) represents the eccentricity at which stimulus size must double to achieve equivalent-to-foveal performance) all data could be fit with a single function. The average E(2) value was .91 (SEM=.19, N=6) in the walker-direction discrimination task and 1.34 (SEM=.21, N=6) in the walker identification task. We conclude that size scaling is sufficient to equate discrimination and identification of point-light walkers across the visual field.